Laserfiche WebLink
*-� c SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue P Floor Stockton•CA 95202-2708 <br /> . �' '•: s t•;;� (209)468-3420•Far:(209)464-0138 • Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> nPA V: C? —mac U 163 <br /> SITE LOCATION: REPORT DATE: j ;Z <br /> S = Sufricicnt San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905,Section 9-905.12 <br /> 1 Imufficient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all parcels), including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of proposed development. ; <br /> \r ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. �. { ��� o <br /> ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples:structures,drives,wells, septic systems, large trees, <br /> pastures,pools,natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways,etc.) 1 PFw` A,D <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past,present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information:current and/or previous property owners,historical maps•insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications,etc.) , <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.1 Digcussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> Sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search,EHD records search,agricultural <br /> chemical application search,site reconnaissance and survey,etc.) tj 3 -y I '4&-t Y't- J) <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handfing/storage/use,aboveground/underground tanks, <br /> septic systems,injection wells,unsealed wells, ponds/lagoons,vehiclelmachine repair/pai11 nting,buried or <br /> stockpiled solid waste,etc.)pcis4,LL li�wi f,Awl f`S, PV <br /> FX] ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site(see examples above). Yl� '/• <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site- (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former gasoline station,in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact,etc.)py (/- V- <br /> 3.5 <br /> 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. y y <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATIO IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified(in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. /!u 5-- <br /> 5.0 <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e.collection of soiVwater samples)and/or mitigative measures C-e.,dean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must indude a time frame for implementation./'y � L <br /> ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive(.e.all information referenced was inducted in this report-report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> a ❑ 5.3 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. ;-r <br /> 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application.Ad,'Ln L-r <br /> 1-1 <br /> © ❑ Sla%nM"bfrr/ <br /> 5.5 The attachments appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report- <br /> Reviewed Reviewed B =!� Reviewed Date: 1 <br /> y- LaLa <br /> EHD 26-02-001 Page I of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14,2003 <br />