My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002289
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PLYMOUTH
>
3838
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-95-11
>
SU0002289
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:10 AM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:45:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002289
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-95-11
STREET_NUMBER
3838
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
PLYMOUTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3838 N PLYMOUTH RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\P\PLYMOUTH\3838\UP-95-11\SU0002289\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\P\PLYMOUTH\3838\UP-95-11\SU0002289\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\P\PLYMOUTH\3838\UP-95-11\SU0002289\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 15, 1995 <br /> A&G 1 X19 <br /> V//J 9S <br /> PZ4N��N�C�WrME�/ <br /> ����ON Q&°T <br /> Mr. Richard Larrouy <br /> San Joaquin County Community Development Department <br /> Development Services Division <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Ref- Application Number UP-95-11 <br /> Applicant ACLC <br /> Dear Mr. Larrouy, <br /> We would like to be on the mailing list to receive a copy of the Development Services Division action <br /> on the matter referenced above. <br /> Please include our comments for consideration by the Development Committee meeting on August 30, <br /> 1995. <br /> There are several problems with the proposal by ACLC. I will outline the problems below: <br /> 1. Non-conforming land use. There are no apartments in the area where the proposed project will be <br /> located. The surrounding properties are mostly single-family residences. The project requires two- <br /> story builings while most of the neighborhood consists of single-story construction. <br /> 2. Lack of school facilities. The project is for large families. However, Tyler school has no additional <br /> capacity for new students. My children were not able to attend Tyler school because of a lack of <br /> available space. If room cannot be found for two children, it seems that finding the room for as many as <br /> 100 children will be much more difficult. <br /> 3. Sewer system problems. The sewage system grid cannot adequately handle current residents. The <br /> system releases sewage gases into the nearby neighborhood on occasion and residents have been told <br /> that the sewage system is inadequate. <br /> 4. Traffic flow. To access the proposed project, automobiles will have to travel along Plymouth Road, <br /> Alpine Avenue, or Webster Avenue and Del Rio Drive. The new freeway access will require residents <br /> of the new project to drive to River Road and circle around to meet either the northbound or <br /> southbound onramps of I-5. This will create an additional hazard on residential streets where children <br /> 8/15/95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.