Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 3 <br /> PC: 5-7-92 <br /> SA-92-25 <br /> Page 4 <br /> AREA/NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY: <br /> Operational Characteristics: <br /> Two additional employees will be hired to staff the proposed facility, and a recommended <br /> Condition of Approval has been developed to require one additional employee parking space, as <br /> required by Section 9-3700(k) of the Planning Title. <br /> The letters of opposition raise questions regarding the safety of the existing dry fertilizer sales <br /> facility -specifically the storage of dry chemicals in open bins, the lack of a retaining wall around <br /> the entire facility, and the fact that the retention pond is not lined. One of the letters also <br /> mentioned chemical spills on Priest Road and an explosion on the site. <br /> The retention pond is designed to accommodate storm water runoff from the facility; as such, it <br /> is not lined. To do so would prevent storm water from percolating into the ground. The retention <br /> pond has not been used in the past, nor will it be as a result of approving this application, for the <br /> collection of any fertilizer products. The liquid fertilizer storage and mixing facility will be placed <br /> on an impervious surface and surrounded by a berm or other containment feature, as required <br /> by the recommended Conditions of Approval,thereby preventing liquid fertilizer from entering the <br /> storm pond. The existing operations on the site are taking place in compliance with the adopted <br /> Conditions of Approval for Use Permit Application No. UP-80-9, as well as under the applicable <br /> permits and approvals of the Air Pollution Control District and the Office of Emergency Services. <br /> For that reason,this application deals with the proposed new use: the liquid fertilizer storage and <br /> mixing facility. The existing operation is considered only in terms of how it would be affected by <br /> the proposed use. None of the referral responses received from responsible agencies indicated <br /> the need to modify either the operation or design of the existing facility, nor did those responses, <br /> including one from the French Camp Fire District, indicate a history of fertilizer spills, explosions <br /> on the site, or underground chemical leaks. <br /> Traffic: <br /> The letters of opposition state that traffic is now a problem in the area due to the use of the public <br /> scale and the switching of trains by the Union Pacific Railroad. <br /> The application states that the proposed liquid fertilizer facility will add only approximately four <br /> customer trips per day to the overall facility, in addition to the two employee trips per day and <br /> approximately one material delivery truck per week. The remainder of the material will be <br /> delivered to the site via the railroad spur lines located on the property to the east of the project <br /> site. The Department of Public Works has stated that the increase in the number of vehicle trips <br /> as a result of the expanded use is not considered significant. The additional railroad activity that <br /> will be associated with the proposed use is also not expected to be significant. <br /> Access to the site is provided by an existing driveway along the property's frontage on Priest <br /> Road. The proposed new use will make use of that driveway without adversely affecting the <br /> overall movement of vehicles on Priest Road. In order to further reduce potential impacts of the <br /> existing operation on Priest Road, the applicant has opened a previously padlocked gate on the <br /> north end of the adjacent railroad property for use by trucks entering and exiting the facility. The <br />