My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006597_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
10420
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0700260
>
SU0006597_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:52:18 PM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:48:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006597
PE
2691
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0700260
STREET_NUMBER
10420
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
APN
08607034
ENTERED_DATE
6/13/2007 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
10420 N HWY 99
RECEIVED_DATE
6/12/2007 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\10420\PA-0700260\SU0006597\SS STDY.PDF \MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\10420\PA-0700260\SU0006597\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
op�? (N C1r SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3`d Floor Stockton-CA 95202-2708 <br /> ' J (209)468-3420 -Fax:(209)464-0138 - Web:www.co.san-ioaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> PA#: 07-260 $261 (GP/ZR) <br /> SITE LOCATION: 10420 N. STATE ROUTE 99, STOCKTON IIII <br /> REPORT GATE: 5/17/2007 9 <br /> I <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL V <br /> ® / ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> N✓ ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> N✓ ❑ 2.1 Description of. depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> ® ✓ ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> E site. <br /> N ,/ ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> N ✓ ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> —_ N ❑ ✓ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. DAW &,o7 !a p <br /> ® ✓ ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> N ,/ ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ®� ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> HanztchlFinnemore, or other appropriate formulalmodel, if applicable. <br /> N✓ ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> N o/ ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> OV ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> andlor any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> N✓ ❑ . 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> N ❑y/ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. .Scnc <br /> /O <br /> rd 317- <br /> Reviewed <br /> •2Reviewed By: Michael F. Escotto Reviewed Date: 6/26/2007 <br /> EHD 26-02-M Pagel of 2 Surfh= Sub chest <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.