Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br /> The TMF process is not the an effective stop gate. To allow the project to progress knowing a permit to <br /> operate the water system may not be issued to a HOA, once the subdivision has already been approved is a <br /> little late. It would be better to have all the information, regarding if and how a permit can be issued with a <br /> HOA, before it progresses much further. <br /> Adrienne <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> From: Rodney Estrada [EH] <br /> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:23 AM <br /> To: Adrienne Ellsaesser [EH] <br /> Cc: Donna Heran [EH]; Laurie Cotulla [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Arbor MHP WS <br /> Adrienne, <br /> The change of ownership of the MHP, if and when it becomes a homeowner's association (HOA), will not <br /> occur as part of the current land use project(Major Subdivision Application). The Department of Real <br /> Estate will require the formation of a HOA in order to allow the sale of individual lots, after the land use <br /> I project is approved. It would appear from Joe's email that the method of permitting of the water system will <br /> be determined at the time of application for change of ownership. I spoke with joe regarding the timing of <br />' land use approval vs the change of ownship permitting process and also sent him a copy via email of the <br /> letter from Gilchrist& Rutter. Thanks, <br /> Rod <br /> From: Adrienne Ellsaesser [EH] <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:18 PM <br /> To: Rodney Estrada [EH] <br /> Cc: Laurie Cotulla [EH]; Donna Heran [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: Arbor MHP WS <br /> FYI- The C DPH does have concerns with their proposal. Please hold off on the land <br /> use <br /> project until I hear back from MPH. <br /> j Thank you, <br /> Adrienne <br /> I <br /> From: Spano, Joseph (CDPH-DDWEM) [mailto:Joseph.Spano@cdph.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:56 PM <br /> To: Haberman, Richard (CDPH-DDWEM-DWFO) <br /> Cc: Adrienne Ellsaesser [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: Arbor MHP WS <br /> If this conversion goes forward, what if your suggestion for preventing the establishment of a water <br /> system owned and operated by a homeowner's association. Would it simply be the County denying <br /> a permit for such an arrangement and notifying the MHP that it will have to establish a public type of <br /> water system ownership, such as a community services district, a public utility district, a water <br /> district under state law, or some similar acceptable form of ownership? <br /> My better thought is that this will have to go through a change of ownership, so TMF will have to be <br /> established before the new permit can be issued. Would that be the best place to require the <br /> establishment of a public water utility? Thanks. <br /> i <br /> 6/16/2009 <br />