Laserfiche WebLink
LIVE OAK 6EO ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> ' Surface A Subsurface Contamination Report-The Arbor Mobile Nome Park, Acampo <br /> Jane 30, 2000 <br /> /8. A septic treatment and disposal It appears that the past septic system <br /> system is located on the Site. The incidents have been addressed to the <br /> system malfunctioned in 2002 and satisfaction of the regulators. The system <br /> 2004, and incidents of surfacing is reportedly being better maintained <br /> sewage were reported in June of now to minimize any future incidents. <br /> 2008 and May of 2009. (Current and The operators of the septic system should <br /> past on-site) continue to comply with local, State, and <br /> Federal regulations, including Site- <br /> specific requirements from the EHD and <br /> Regional Board. <br /> 9. Two groundwater monitoring wells Nitrate levels within all three monitoring <br /> are located on the Site for the wells have remained below the MCL in <br /> purpose of assessing any impacts to recent years. The operators of the septic <br /> groundwater from the septic system should continue to comply local, <br /> system; an additional well is located State, and Federal regulations, including <br /> off-site to the south. Levels of Site-specific requirements from the EHD <br /> nitrate as N in the three wells have and Regional Board. <br /> ranged from 0.2 to 52.8 mg/L, with <br /> recent test results in the 0.2 to 6 <br /> mg/L range. The Maximum <br /> Contaminant Level (MCL) for <br /> nitrate as N is 10 mg/L. The <br /> monitoring well northeast of the <br /> septic system shows consistently <br /> elevated levels of nitrate compared <br /> to the other two wells. (Current And <br /> past on-site) <br /> X10. One groundwater well and one It appears that the EHD is monitoring the <br /> water treatment system are located Site's drinking water supply and <br /> on the Site. Two destroyed wells treatment system to ensure that water <br /> are located on the Site. (Current and quality goals are met. Assuming the two <br /> past on-site) old wells were adequately destroyed <br /> under County oversight, they should not <br /> pose environmental problems for the Site. <br /> No permit was identified for the <br /> destruction of the well on the east side of <br /> the Site. .If it was not properly destroyed <br /> under EHD oversight, the EHD should be <br /> contacted for guidance in re-abandoning <br /> it. <br /> 12 <br /> a <br /> 13 <br />