My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005948_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
26609
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600100
>
SU0005948_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:52:17 PM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:57:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0005948
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600100
STREET_NUMBER
26609
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
ACAMPO
APN
00509068
ENTERED_DATE
3/7/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26609 N HWY 99
RECEIVED_DATE
3/7/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\26609\PA-0600100\SU0005948\SS STDY .PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L <br /> L October 23, 2006 <br /> /NOA Project Number: E06103A <br /> 6.8 Discussion of Septic System Sizing <br /> Septic System Construction and sizing should follow the San Joaquin County On-Site Wastewater <br /> Disposal Standards where applicable. <br /> jl V7.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> In summary, a satisfactory percolation rate of the soil was achieved in the proposed septic disposal <br /> area on the site for Parcel two. The parcel appears to be suitable for a standard septic system using <br /> leach lines and seepage pits in accordance with EHD requirements. Parcel one to the east of Parcel <br /> two appears suitable for a use of an engineered septic system. Our office has be contracted by the <br /> Lclient to prepare engineered septic system designs.The designs are attached. <br /> No ground water was encountered in any of the borings drilled on the property. No functioning well <br /> exists on the site. <br /> V �8.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> Ir The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the existing and <br /> proposed development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the <br /> time we excavated our test holes and performed the percolation tests. It was assumed that the test <br /> holes and percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> Our professional services were performed, our findings obtained,and our conclusions proposed in <br /> accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of <br /> all other warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional <br /> opinion do not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> NEIL O.ANDERSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. <br /> Nanc} R. I mer,—B.A. avtd Welch,Principal Geologist <br /> Staff cien ' t CEG-2151, CHG-653,PGP-1049 <br /> { <br /> ,xo AL GFS' <br /> 0 4� DAVID J.WELCH <br /> * N0.2151 <br /> CEWEEO <br /> ENGINEERNG <br /> GEOLOGIST <br /> } 8 '404 <br /> L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.