My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005734_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
3304
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500708
>
SU0005734_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:52:17 PM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0005734
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500708
STREET_NUMBER
3304
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
APN
17908202
ENTERED_DATE
10/27/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3304 S HWY 99
RECEIVED_DATE
10/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\3304\PA-0500708\SU0005734\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3rd Floor Stockton•CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420•Faz:(209)464-0138• Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> \yLiFoae�� <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: "'- S � 9,z PA#: Os'—FID ?7 <br /> REPORT DATE: �Sfyle <br /> S = Sufficient <br /> l = Insufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 94105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. /'y f S•%/ <br /> ��❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. ('� 3 � �� h, � y •a .� <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ❑� ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> ❑� ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> she. ,% r—"/ /5� y <br /> ❑% ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. ' <br /> , ,/ <br /> / <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> �/ ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project she. <br /> ❑'� ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-she sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project she. <br /> ❑� ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-she sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> t _load from these sources to the project site. <br /> FT 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of P9 C' <br /> ztch/Finnemore,or other appropriate formulalmodel, if applicable. <br /> � ft`Y <br /> ❑ � <br /> Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. /p <br /> �- ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the project site. } <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION 7 <br /> �' ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ��❑ 5.2 The altachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: / <br /> Cm 2sO2m2 Page 1 of 2 s�rr��s <br /> 7/14/2003 see cn«ku,i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.