My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008326_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4274
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000135
>
SU0008326_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:52:19 PM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:59:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0008326
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000135
STREET_NUMBER
4274
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
APN
17917236 37
ENTERED_DATE
6/28/2010 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4274 S HWY 99
RECEIVED_DATE
6/24/2010 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\4274\PA-1000135\SU0008326\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3'd Floor Stockton■CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420 -Fax.(209)464-01.38 ■ Web.www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br />� <br /> SITE LOCATION:4274 S.Hwy 99,STOCKTON PA#: 10-135(SA)REPORT GATE' 10/10/2010 <br /> r <br /> Suffi <br /> S = Insufficent <br /> ient <br /> San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> Y = Insufficiettt <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ® ,/ ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ®� 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ®Y ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> ®/ ❑ 2.2 Descriptionldiscussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ® ✓ ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of.groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ®✓ ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ®/ ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ®V1 ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ®1/ ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ®ti/ ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formulatmodel,if applicable. <br /> ® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ® V1 ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ® , / ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> v and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the proiect site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ® V ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ® ,� ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Michael F. Escotto Reviewed Date: 5/20/2011 <br /> i <br /> E14D 26-02-002 Pagel of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.