Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 2 <br /> PC : 1-5-89 <br /> MS-89-21 <br /> Page 8 <br /> REFERRALS AND REPLIES <br /> Application referrals were sent out on 10-5-88 , with responses <br /> due 11-8-88 . Referrals for the appeal were sent on 12-7-88 , with <br /> responses due 12-15-88 . <br /> Department of Public Works (response, 11-8-88 ; revised, 11-23-88 ; <br /> response to appeal , 12-16-88 ) : <br /> Refer to the discussion under "Conditions of Approval . " <br /> "The Department of Public Works recommends denial of the appeal <br /> of approved Condition No . 2 (b) ( 4) . <br /> "The frontage improvements are required under the authority of <br /> Section 66411 . 1 of the Subdivision Map Act . This Section allows <br /> us to require ' construction of reasonable off-site improvements <br /> for the parcels being created, ' and it is felt our frontage <br /> improvement requirement is reasonable . The improvement plan <br /> approved in 1972 had required concrete curb and gutter along the <br /> total frontage of the commercially zoned property. ) The widening <br /> of the road is necessary for the public health and safety and to <br /> provide for orderly development of surrounding areas as provided <br /> in Section 66411 . 1 (b) ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) . " <br /> Local Health District (response, 10-24-88 ) : <br /> Refer to the discussion under "Conditions of Approval . " <br /> As of 12-16-88 , the following have not responded: <br /> County Counsel Building Inspection <br /> Supervisorial District 4 Pacific Bell <br /> PG&E Caltrans <br /> Stockton East Water District City of Stockton <br /> Lodi School District Waterloo-Morada Fire Department <br /> Morada Municipal Advisory Council <br /> APPLICATION DATA <br /> A legal ad of the public hearing was published in the Stockton <br /> Record on 12-26-88 . <br /> No . of public hearing notices mailed: 18 . Date : 12-23-88 . <br /> The staff report was prepared by Chandler Martin. <br />