SU0000782 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To Planning Commission From: Thomas M. Gau Sub : MS-93-106 (Baldocch) Date: 1-20-94 Page: -3- 9. 3-9. The design d thosubdNISIM PMWOW to ft 0ctent feasible,for future passlve or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision. • This Finding Can.be node because the homesfte parcel Is large enough so that an Irtdivldual4weiiing can be situated to talo idvantap,of solar o. dentatlon. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project site Is designated as A(G (General Agricx e . rw GWwW,,Pisn, with a consistent implementing zone of AG-40 (General Agriculture; 40-acre m -num parcel size)• The 53.3-acre parcel is under Williamson Act Contract. The applicant's fegc Is for a Minor SuOdIvIslon application to cress a 10-arae homesite parcel and a designated remainder of 43.3 acres from st parcei contWnkq 83,3 acres. The parcel Is located at the southeast corner of Bethany Road and Naglse Road, north of Tracy. Access to Parcel 1 would be provided by direct frontage on math of the.:j Aftf rcadway31-and amass to the designated remainder would be provided by direct frontage on Naghn Road. On-site services would be utilized for future developmea on the parcels. 4, BACKGROUND: Minor Subdivision Appllc$tlon,No. MS-82S3 was d by staff, n December 30, 1591, for the applicant to•subdivide ft,subject parcel containing 63.3 acres,at the timq Into a 104un owner-operator homesite parcel and a 53.3-acre designated remainder. The homesite parcel Is not currently owned by the applicant. On December 16, 1982,the Planning Commission approvedp 1,884=tnonumite Parcel(APN 212-080- 11)on the subject parcel for a previous owner under Panel Map Application No.PM-83-42 The homesite parcel was configured to contain exlsfta9ftiloxal buil and to separate the two existing residences onto separate parcels. That homesite parcel Is not currently owned by the person for whom it was created. iSSIIE: General Plan Cornsiszertcy_ As noted in Findings Na 1 and Z above, the application Is Inconsistent with General Plan Agricultural Objective No 1, due to the fragmentation of mural lands represented by the proposed creation of a second homesite.pawl on the sae..byr#W&Aa=pAopecty owner. Agricultural Policy No. 7 states that there shall is no farther fn of nand designated for agricultural use, except In three specific cases. One except!on under which this and other homesite subdivisions have been filed reads as folloMrs: 'Parcel for homesites may be trued,p vAded that to Genwral Plan dersily.la not exceeded.-