My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002690
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NEWTON
>
4239
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-99-14
>
SU0002690
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:24 AM
Creation date
9/8/2019 1:02:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002690
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
SA-99-14
STREET_NUMBER
4239
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
NEWTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
10/31/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4239 N NEWTON RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\NEWTON\4239\SA-99-14\SU0002690\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\N\NEWTON\4239\SA-99-14\SU0002690\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\N\NEWTON\4239\SA-99-14\SU0002690\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\N\NEWTON\4239\SA-99-14\SU0002690\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BASIS OF APPEAL <br /> State the basis of the appeal. List any findings of fact made by the staff which you feel were wrong and <br /> your reasons: <br /> On May 17, 1999 Site Applications No. SA-9-14 and SA-9-li were approved. The approval was trade <br /> despite the complaints made by Miles A. Parrish. The following actions by the County and its employees <br /> were wrong. <br /> I. On February 11, 1999 the County accepted and application for bill board signs from Outdoor Systems <br /> despite the fact that there were existing signs on the Parrish property which would preclude any new <br /> signs in the area. an application from Obie <br /> 2 While the Parrish signs were still in place the County declined to accept PP <br /> Media to replace the Parrish signs with new ones. Miles Pamsh's intention's never included the <br /> permanent removal of the signs. His intention was to contract with a new sign company that was <br /> willing to pay$1750.00 a year in rents rather than the 5600.00 offered by Outdoor Systems. The <br /> changes being made should be viewed same as finding a new renter without a change in use. <br /> s action <br /> ;. When the County realized that they had a problem, County Counsel called T The lack ck oon fa procedure <br /> clearly shows that no procedure was in place to handle this type problem. <br /> eliminates competition and as in this case hurts the land owner financially. for many years. <br /> 4. Parrish was denied any priority despite that the signs had existed on their property <br /> 5. No formal notice was given by Outdoor Systems to Parrish that the signs would be removed and no <br /> permits were issued to remove the signs. <br /> 6. The County's procedure as"now" defined does not allow the property owner to protect himself in any <br /> way. <br /> List any conditions or findings being appealed and give reasons why you think it should be modified or <br /> removed: <br /> Both of the Site Approval Applications in question should be denied. The permit process is designnoulde aed to <br /> control the type, amount and quality of building projects in our county. I do not believe <br /> means for unscrupulous businessmen to avoid open competition. The County's stand that they will act on <br /> a first come first served basis provides sign companies with a protective shelter. When a land owner <br /> questions the amount of rents he receives for having s�o do s apply sign on hsor propertypermitthe t put a span acrany o s the not have <br /> to negotiate in good faith. All the sign company <br /> street. If the sign company does not reach a new agreement with the land owner, the landowner is locked <br /> out from replacing the signs with new signs from a new company. <br /> In summary I feel that your decision to reject Obie Media's application for the signs is unfair and bias. We <br /> ask for a reversal of your approval for these site applications. <br /> �.itiJGG�L <br /> Aes A. Parrish 5- 'Z 7— `/ -7 <br /> PERMIT TRACKING <br /> MAY 27 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.