My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0003611 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NORTH RIPON
>
16910
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
LA-01-102
>
SU0003611 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:05 AM
Creation date
9/8/2019 1:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0003611
PE
2690
FACILITY_NAME
LA-01-102
STREET_NUMBER
16910
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
NORTH RIPON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
APN
20308022
ENTERED_DATE
5/7/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
16910 S NORTH RIPON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
2/19/2002 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\NORTH RIPON\16910\LA-01-102\SU0003611\NL_SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> r. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMMT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3`d Floor Stockton • CA 95202-2708 <br /> �. (209)468-3420 • Far:(209)464-0138 • Web: www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> APP #: LA-01-102 <br /> [SITE LOCATION: 16910 S. NORTH RIPON ROAD, RIPON REPORT DATE: JULY 21, 2003 <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ® ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ❑ ® 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ® ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> ® ❑ site. <br /> 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> ❑ ® to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> El ® <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ® ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> ❑ ® these sources to the project site. <br /> 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> ® ❑ load from these sources to the project site. <br /> 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> ® ❑ Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> ❑ ® 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ® ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ® ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the oroiect site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ® ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ ® 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Larry Godinho, Senior R.E.H.S., R.D. I. Reviewed Date: August 12, <br /> 2004 <br /> Page I of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> EHD 26-02-002 <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.