Laserfiche WebLink
The initial October 13, 2007 test results revealed the presence of Total Coliform bacteria. The new <br /> well was subsequently chlorinated by the well driller and two additional samples were taken on <br /> October 29 and November 6. Both these tests showed the presence of Total Coliform. The well <br /> was chlorinated again under strict published guidelines on December 3 and sampled December 4. <br /> This sample was take under Chain of Custody to a different laboratory with test results indicating <br /> 'T otal Coliform absen All well sampling events were done under strict sampling protocol <br /> including well purging, spraying the sample port with diluted bleach, latex gloves, proper sample <br /> containers, and refrigerated transport. <br /> Calculation of Alkalinity Requirement for Nitrification <br /> The nitrate-nitrogen loading calculations on Page 10 are contingent upon the environmental factors <br /> required for nitrification to occur. These conditions include soil pore-space oxygen content, soil <br /> temperature,pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and alkalinity. <br /> Alkalinity in wastewater effluent is derived from the domestic well water supply in addition to the <br /> introduction of wastes. <br /> Nitrification consumes approximately 7.1 mg of alkalinity for every mg of ammonia-nitrogen <br /> (NH4 N) oxidized. Nitrification of the average Total Nitrogen (TN) concentration of 113 mg/L <br /> would require: 113 mg/L NH4-N x 7.1 mg CaCO3 = 802 mg/L alkalinity. The alkalinity of the <br /> underlying aquifers supplying the domestic water supply is much lower than this concentration <br /> based upon previous analyses. Therefore, the low alkalinity concentration may theoretically inhibit <br /> nitrification to an indeterminable degree. <br /> /Mounding Analysis <br /> Since the groundwater was measure t 22.8 feet from he sounding of the new on-site domestic <br /> well, adverse mounding potential shoul t and inconsequential. Additionally, since a <br /> large percentage of sand is known to occur at the deeper depths, this would also in all likelihood, <br /> prevent the formation of the mound phenomenon under the disposal area. <br /> The critical issue regarding the groundwater elevation is: 1.) There must be sufficient distance <br /> between the soil/effluent interface and the highest anticipated depth to groundwater for sufficient <br /> treatment of effluent to occur, which is generally accepted to be five feet for leachlines and 10 feet <br /> for sumps or seepage pits, and 2.) The water table cannot encroach upon the septic tanks,which <br /> may cause buoyancy. A discussion of separation distance is found in the Conclusions Section of <br /> this Report. <br /> E. SURFACE WATER INFORMATION <br /> Storm water management is on-site containment. There should be no impact to percolating <br /> effluent water from the septic system. Since the groundwater directional flow is to the west, <br /> percolating rainwater runoff from the on-site structures east of the disposal area into the top aquifer <br /> mixing layer may create a dilution effect to the downgradient percolating septic system effluent. <br /> Groundwater dilution effects can only be truly discerned with complicated groundwater monitoring <br /> and modeling. According to a scientific paper authored by Shaw and Turyk (1994), reduction of <br /> nitrate concentrations in groundwater can occur primarily through dispersion, or by percolating <br /> rainwater recharge. <br /> 6 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />