Laserfiche WebLink
-MP 09 191 15:50 REGION �� P. <br /> Qr'r Jaz, as Vc•01ri'i =J";_" MMUNI7'Y�D V. <br /> APPLICATION <br /> Ca T w APPSAL OF STAFF ACTION <br /> SAN ,JOAQUIN CCUNTy COMMUNITY pEVELOPMENT DEPARTMIENT <br /> Namai California De artment of Fish and Game - Reg, 2 <br /> Addrtea; <br /> CAlifgrrils <br /> Phan*, 1 3 -7030 <br /> ww•r <br /> Stals the basis 91 ,s appeal, Urs any Rndinga of fact mads by the rla?I whioh you fool were wrong and your reaaonot <br /> The Da t of Fish and <br /> Findings of Significant Environmental impact and a Statement of 0v rridin consid- <br /> erations and certification of <br /> Steven and Diane MalcaLm 'EI' AL E=ect <br /> (M5-92-7). <br /> The MFG disagrees with mitigation finds Number 4 (detailed below) .that <br /> habitat Losses for waterfowl are mitigated by ponds( golf course areas. More im- <br /> porLant is the lack of any Comrent reg=-ding miLiymLiwti Cines.' LI'LLaatrn� and esrodan <br /> spec es t are o a or near project. All of these concerns were stated <br /> n g y ugus , and must be included in a certified EIR <br /> vemr-0—utilnes ga ion measMVEFEE-r—educe project effects to less than signitic t <br /> levels. o gespec es to as described in the August 27th lette <br /> xs es will occur f this project proceeds with <br /> ' i kation, <br /> Llai■ny oandldon(s)toing appsslsd and give MUM wi~y you think I!Should W modliod w rimovodt <br /> Impact Number 4 of the Findin s of SiT4ficant Environmental IMets <br /> identified La the 26o <br /> provides little or poor wildlife, habitat and that enhanced water areae 2.n the cralf <br /> course adequately compensate lost waterfowl habitat. impact Number 2i conversion <br /> of agricultural land, requires mitigation in contrast to no mitigation offered i <br /> .. . —.. . . • r . .._ .—A ....T L.—t *4�.-1 LL.L ��.�Awe. •...1..yt�1� <br />