Laserfiche WebLink
MCI S <br /> F A M I L Y V I N E Y A R D S <br /> May 5,2003 <br /> MAY 0 9 2003 <br /> Mr.Tim O'Brien ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> California Water Quality Control Board PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> 3443 Routier Road,Suite A <br /> Sacramento,CA 95827-3003 <br /> Dear Tim: <br /> To address the issues raised in the April 4,2003 correspondence from Wendy Wyels,we propose the <br /> following: <br /> 1. Commission a technical study to determine the sources of additional TDS in the winery process. <br /> To this end we have contacted Glenn Dombeck,P.E.,and will commence a Salinity Reduction <br /> Study before the fifteenth of this month. The objective of the study will be to determine the most <br /> efficient and effective means to reduce additions of TDS to the winery waste stream. The study <br /> will involve sampling and analysis of the winery liquid process waste to determine a salt balance <br /> for the winery. Further,the study will propose means by which the winery can reduce its <br /> contribution of TDS to the waste stream or methods to optimize salt management. The time frame <br /> for completing this study is 120 days. This timeframe will allow for an accurate characterization <br /> of TDS-generating activities at the winery. <br /> 2. Upon completion of the study,McManis Family Vineyards will select and evaluate the TDS <br /> reduction alternatives for their feasibility. Upon prioritizing the alternatives,we will implement <br /> those most likely to have the most efficient effect on reducing process water TDS. Time frame for <br /> the implementation of the chosen alternatives would be 90 days after receipt of the study. This <br /> timeframe will allow adequate time for implementation of the selected alternatives within the <br /> context of upcoming harvest activities. <br /> McManis Family Vineyards will continue to sample the winery effluent on a monthly basis prior to its <br /> discharge to the treatment ponds. Given the proposed changes to reduce the TDS of the effluent,we wish <br /> that a deter .inatio::to classify the,inery::,ante as `devignated waste' be dela,ed. ntil+he f rs±,:tarter cf <br /> 2004. <br /> It is interesting to note that the average TDS for the nineteen months prior to the installation of a water <br /> softener averaged 2,100 mg/L and for the sixteen months since the softener was installed in November <br /> 2001 the TDS in the winery effluent has averaged 4,100 mg/L. Consequently,alternative approaches to <br /> j� <br /> IZ 1 PON,CA 95 366 TELEPI-ION 1: 209 599-1186,c-FAX 209 <br /> .. ¢+ • <br />