SU0008336 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Analysis Background The original applicants applied for a subdivision application (PM-81-0090) to divide a twenty-acre parcel into a one-acre homesite parcel and a nineteen-acre parcel. The zoning was GA-5. The application was denied by the Development Committee on January 21, 1981, because the project did not meet the homesite requirements of Section 4104 of the Uniform Zoning Ordinance of San Joaquin County in effect at that time, which required the owner, or a family member who made a substantial living from working on the farm, to live on the one-acre homesite. On January 21, 1981, the original applicant appealed the decision to the Planning Commission The Planning Commission heard the item on February 19, 1981, The Planning Commission voted to approve the subdivision creating the one-acre homesite parcel with the condition that Parcel B (the 19-acre parcel) is not to be a residential building site. The current applicants have owned both parcels since 1989. Williamson Act The nineteen-acre parcel is under Williamson Act contract (No. 77-C1-108). Development Title Section 9- 1810.3 lists a single-family residence as a permitted use on Williamson Act contracted land. Certificate of Correction If the Revisions of Approved Actions application for PM-81-0090 is approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant wifl need to file a Certificate of Correction with the County Surveyor to be recorded on Book 10, Page 74, to remove the note on Parcel B that states "Not a residential building site". Findings Prior to approving an application for a Revisions of Approved Actions for a Parcel Map, the Review Authority must make three findings: (1) There are changes in circumstances which make any or all of the conditions of such map no longer appropriate or necessary, • This Finding can be made because under current regulations for the AG-40 zone, a single- family residence is a permitted use (Development Title Table 9-605.2). (2) The amendments do not impose any additional burden on the present fee owner of the property, and • This Finding can be made because the owner of the property is requesting that the condition be removed. The removal of the condition will not impose any additional burden because the proposed amendment will allow the property owner to construct a single- family residence. San Joaquin County PA-10001401Koller Community Development Page 3