My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
j&_bre <br /> & associates <br /> /�/ ltants in acoustics <br /> P.O. Box 6748 •Aubum,California 95604 <br /> 263 Nevada Street•Auburn, California 95603 <br /> p.530.823.0960 £530.823.0961 • www.jcbrennanassoc.com <br /> October 13,2010 <br /> Mr. Tom Tcrpstra <br /> Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra <br /> 578 N. Wilma Avenue,Suite A <br /> Ripon,CA 95366 <br /> Subject: Review of Munn & Perkins Increased Nighttime Operations Environmental <br /> Noise Assessment <br /> Dear Mr.Terpstra: <br /> j.c. brennan & associates, Inc. has reviewed the Revised Environmental Noise <br /> Assessment for the above referenced project. The analysis was conducted by Bollard <br /> Acoustical Consultants (BAC), dated August 23, 2010. The revisions are in response to <br /> several letters sent by San Joaquin County Community Development Department and the <br /> Senior Code Enforcement Officer, Mr. Rick Matuska, outlining the noise complaints <br /> which had been received since 2003 with regards to the excessive noise coming from the <br /> plant due to plant operations after the approved operating hours, and on nights that were <br /> not approved for night operations. <br /> We have provided reviews of two previous draft reports dated October 7, 2009 and July <br /> 1, 2010. For the most part, the final analysis does not deviate in methods, procedures or <br /> even conclusions from the previous reports. This review will provide comments on <br /> specific flaws which we have found in the report, and will detail the pages of the report <br /> where they occur. However, it may be useful to summarize the major flaws in the report <br /> prior to providing detailed comments. <br /> SUMMARY OF MAJOR TECHNICAL PROBLEMS WITH THE REPORT <br /> A. The report provides a discussion on the effects of single event noise, primarily <br /> due to increased truck traffic on local roadways. The discussion centers around <br /> the potential for sleep disturbance, and utilizes the Federal Interagency <br /> Committee on Aviation Noise (FICAN) report which estimated a 5 — 10% of the <br /> population is affected when interior SEI, noise levels are between 65 and 81 dB, <br /> and few sleep awakenings (less than 5%) are predicted if the interior SEL is less <br /> than 65 dB. This procedure does not account for the number of events. <br /> However, most recent research and procedures for evaluating sleep disturbance <br /> are based upon the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) which has <br /> developed procedures for evaluating the potential for sleep disturbance. The <br /> Procedure ANSI/ASA S12.9-2008 / Part 6 sets for the procedures for evaluating <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.