Laserfiche WebLink
result in 26 hourly truck trips per hour during the nighttime hours. Based <br /> upon Table 7 of the BAC report, the average measured hourly background <br /> noise levels during the nighttime periods ranged between 59 dBA Leq and <br /> 62 dBA Leq at a distance of 60 feet from the centerline (Site 4). This <br /> corresponds with the closest building fariade to the roadway, as stated in <br /> the BAC report, if you use the lowest SEL value shown in the BAC report <br /> for truck passbys (79 dBA) at 60 feet, the Leq associated with the 26 <br /> trucks would be 62 dBA. Therefore, the nighttime noise levels would <br /> increase between 3 dBA and 4 dBA Leq. Based upon the F1CON criteria <br /> shown in Table 3 of the report, this would result in a significant increase <br /> in noise levels. What the analysis does not mention, is that the increase in <br /> noise levels which trigger a significant impact is based upon an increase in <br /> noise levels of the same character. So, if the ambient noise during the <br /> nighttime period is not a function of truck traffic, the increase in noise <br /> levels due to truck tragic could be more annoying than indicated. <br /> MITIGATION OPTIONS <br /> 19. Page 37 of the BAC report provides mitigation options. First of all we do not <br /> believe that the impacts have been adequately identified, and therefore,mitigation <br /> measures may not have been fully addressed. <br /> 20. The recommended mitigation measure for truck passbys seems unenforceable. <br /> Educating truck drivers on proper gear usage, speed and rpm of the engine is <br /> difficult to enforce,at best. <br /> 21. The mitigation measures indicate that upgrades to building facades is not <br /> recommended due to the fact that there would not be a significant impact <br /> associated with truck passbys. However, the ANSI procedure used by j.c. <br /> brennan & associates, Inc. indicates that the potential for sleep disturbance is <br /> 97%, which would indicate a significant impact. Building fagade upgrades would <br /> be a likely mitigation measure. A sound proofing analysis of the homes, <br /> conducted by an acoustical consultant would identify the appropriate upgrades to <br /> homes along East River Road. <br /> 22. There is no mention of mitigation for the asphalt plant. BAC staff have <br /> previously worked on an asphalt plant in Truckee California, where noise <br /> complaint resulted from nighttime operations. The installation of a silencer on the <br /> stack of the asphalt plant burner resulted in significant decreases in noise levels. <br /> 23.There is no mention of the use of strobes instead of back-up alarms on mobile <br /> equipment to reduce noise levels. <br /> 24.There is no mention of shielding of equipment through barriers or stockpiling of <br /> resource to reduce noise levels. <br /> 10 <br />