My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nickerson asked. "How much of the nighttime product can be made during the day and how <br /> long can you be in transit until the product is not adequate to be used in the job?' <br /> Attebery responded, "Asphalt is made early and stored in the silos and has a shelf life of two hours. In the <br /> truck it has a life of one hour." <br /> Commissioner Johnson, commented, "Has anyone from either side reached out to discuss the issues of <br /> noise and odor?" <br /> Attebery responded, "The applicant has reached out to the oppositions counsel, however, no one has <br /> visited any of the homes. Munn and Perkins is willing to reach out to the neighbors for any other on the <br /> ground solutions." <br /> Terpstra responded, "The applicant's counsel has visited my office and was interested in finding a solution <br /> to the noise and an EIR was prepared to analyze noise, however, no one has visited the homes." <br /> Commissioner Hamilton asked, "Are the sub haulers paid by the load or by the hour?' <br /> Attebery responded, "It can vary depending on the contract." <br /> PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: <br /> Commissioner Villapudua said he agrees with the opponents on all regards specifically noise and odor. <br /> Commissioner Morn said he would not like to live in the area where the amount of trucks would increase at <br /> night and a truck passes by every two to three minutes. Truck drivers will take the shortest and fastest route <br /> to get to the job. He disagrees with the EIR and there is not an adequate analysis in regards to noise. Also, <br /> the problem with disclosure in any Real Estate transaction is a problem for the neighbors. <br /> Commissioner Hamilton said, the neighbors seem fine with daytime operations, but has seen where sub- <br /> haulers are in a rush to get to the job site because they are being paid for the hours worked. As a result <br /> Jake brakes are used. He favors the neighbor's position on this project. <br /> Commissioner Nickerson said, there is the potential to disturb thousands of commuters during the day if Cal <br /> Trans decides to pave roads during daylight hours. These are good reasons why Cal Trans paves roads at <br /> night. Also, two problems have been identified noise and odor. Both are a little bit less if you close the <br /> window and the number of people awakening at night is 97%-99%. Some people have hearing that might <br /> not be acute and there many variables to this conclusion and he has problems with the percentage of <br /> people who will be awakened. <br /> Commissioner Nickerson noted that staffs recommendation from denial to approval for this project changed <br /> and needed additional clarification. <br /> John Funderburg, said, there was additional information regarding the project history that was not available <br /> during the early preparation of the first staff report. After, staff reviewed the site project specifics, history and <br /> Development Title Staff was able to recommend approval for the project and prepare a Statement of <br /> Overriding Considerations for the proposed request. <br /> Mark Myles, also stated,the change in staffs recommendation from denial to approval was based on <br /> reviewing additional history for the project site including the te)d amendment in 1998 to allow for the <br /> continuation of accessory uses and the revisions of approved actions application in 1999 to e)dend the life of <br /> the quarry until March 4, 2029.Without this clarification along with the project benefits staff would have <br /> continued to recommend denial of the application and not consider a Statement of Overriding <br /> PC MINUTES 9 PC: 2-2-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.