My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> A. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 <br /> B. PROJECT SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 1 <br /> B.I. Project Objectives.................................................................................................. I <br /> B.2. Project Description................................................................................................. 1 <br /> C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& PUBLIC PARTICIPATION......................................2 <br /> C.I. Certification EIR.................................................................................................... 2 <br /> C.2. Custodian and Location of the Record...................................................................3 <br /> C.3. Independent Judgment...........................................................................................3 <br /> CA. Finding on EIR.......................................................................................................3 <br /> C.5. General Findings on Mitigation Measures............................................................. 3 <br /> C.6. Absence of Significant New Information..............................................................4 <br /> D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS....................................................................................... 6 <br /> D.1. Findings Regarding Impacts Identified in the EIR to be Less Than Significant and <br /> RequiringNo Mitigation........................................................................................ 7 <br /> D.2. Findings Regarding Impacts Analyzed in the EIR and Determined to be <br /> Significant but Mitigated to Less Than Significant............................................... 8 <br /> D.3. Findings Regarding Impacts Analyzed in the EIR and Determined to be <br /> Significant and Unavoidable.................................................................................. 9 <br /> D.4. Other CEQA Required Analysis in the EIR........................................................ 11 <br /> E. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT........................................................................... 12 <br /> E.I. Alternatives Considered but Rejected As Infeasible During the Scoping Process 13 <br /> E.2. Alternatives Evaluated in the EIR........................................................................ 14 <br /> E.3. Findings Regarding Alternatives Considered in the EIR..................................... 14 <br /> F. PROJECT BENEFITS..................................................................................................... 18 <br /> F.I. Maintain and Create Jobs..................................................................................... 18 <br /> F.2. Locally Supplying CalTrans Highway Nighttime Projects...........................19 <br /> F.3. Shorter Haul Routes Reduce Emissions ............................................................. 19 <br /> F.4. Shorter Haul Routes Reduce Noise Impacts...........................................20 <br /> F.5. Regional Economic Benefits.............................................................20 <br /> G. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS..............................................21 <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.