SU0007300 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Changes to Mitigation Measures. As described in the Final EIR and in the responses to comments, Mitigation Measure 3.3.has been modified. The Commission finds that these changes to the mitigation measures in the Final EIR augment the mitigation measures as proposed in the Draft EIR, strengthen the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures,respond to public input, and enhance their clarity, but do not cause any new or more severe environmental impacts. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines,no recirculation of the EIR is necessary based on the changes and additions to the mitigation measures in the Final EIR. Other Changes. Various minor changes and edits have been made to the text,tables, and figures of the Draft EIR. These changes are generally of an administrative nature such as correcting typographical errors, making minor adjustments to the data, and adding or changing certain phrases to improve readability and enhance clarity. The Commission finds that these changes are of a minor,non- substantive nature and do not require recirculation of the EIR. In addition to the changes and corrections described above,the Final EIR provides additional information in response to comments and questions from agencies and the public. The Commission finds that this additional information does not constitute significant new information requiring recirculation, but rather that the additional information clarifies or amplifies an adequate EIR. Specifically,the Commission finds that the additional information including the changes described above, does not show that: (1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented. (2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. (3) A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project,but the project's proponents decline to adopt it. (4) The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. Findings: Based on the foregoing Section C.5 of these Findings, and having reviewed the information contained in the Final EIR and in the record of Agency's proceedings, including the comments on the Draft EIR and the responses thereto, and the above-described information, the Commission hereby finds that no significant new information has been added to the Final EIR since public notice was given of the availability of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation of the EIR. 5