My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0001042
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROLERSON
>
2355
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-92-133
>
SU0001042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:28:15 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:08:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0001042
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-92-133
STREET_NUMBER
2355
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ROLERSON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
10/10/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2355 W ROLERSON RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\ROLERSON\2355\MS-92-133\SU0001042\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\R\ROLERSON\2355\MS-92-133\SU0001042\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\R\ROLERSON\2355\MS-92-133\SU0001042\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\R\ROLERSON\2355\MS-92-133\SU0001042\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPLICATION - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> ACTION <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> TO Be CDNPISTED BY THEAPPUC/INT PRIOR TO hLINO THE APPLICATION 1 <br /> Name: TED AND CYNTHEA WITT <br /> Address: 2357 ROLERSON ROAD <br /> STOCKTON CA 95206 <br /> Phone. A63-$302 <br /> BASIS FOR APPEAL <br /> �;r. cruv;ah to your its" I.brcausa 666 the finding:and facts you rules in your appeal.statement will be Included In the- <br /> statri tsportto 04 Biivtso <br /> 'Board'o{6uprs. (Attach additional sheets N necessary.) - <br /> File number: MS-92-133 I Action being appealed:PLANNING COMMISSION DECISI N <br /> Date of Planning Commission action: OCTOBER 15, 1992 <br /> State the basis of the appeal. List any findings of lett mads by the-eteR whyou feet were wrong and your reasons: <br /> 1. THE APPROVAL OF MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. MS-92-133 <br /> WAS RECOMMENDED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY STAFF. <br /> 2. ALL OF THE APPLICABLE FINDINGS CAN BE MADE AS MORE <br /> SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN THE STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. <br /> 3. ALL OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE APPLICANT. <br /> 4. THE HOMESITE PARCEL IS CONSISTENT WITH BOTH THE 1995 GENERAL PLAN <br /> AND THE RECENTLY ADOPTED 2010 GENERAL PLAN. <br /> List any condhion(s)being appealed and give reasons why you think M should be modified or removed- <br /> NIA <br /> emoved:N A <br /> r ( Aj%v[ <br /> Signature: Q Date: <br /> C ;�a� <br /> AP NO: Date appeal flied: <br /> Fee: P <br /> HecN 1 No: Appeal accepted by: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.