Laserfiche WebLink
10113/2900 11:14 510F,651R21 PMPD PAGE 06 <br /> &3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls <br /> No P0tC'5tial polychlorinated biphenyls (PCS)-cootaining equipment was observed on the Property, <br /> 6.4 On-site Regulated Substance Identificattona.,euto[y <br /> flu•.. <br /> +'�itShrk' <br /> No regulated substances were observed on the property. <br /> {4 Arm Reconnaissance <br /> " <br /> •�':"' <br /> 4 ssorlce <br /> •1 Adjacent Properties .IS•}Y: YA�9:R:f::t::f:f7R`:fik' <br /> ;•I •• •'Y:"�� •d'4:h f�ftt+Katete:at�e:te:+ <br /> ' ICi1i. ��55��ytt}RRN41: NRYt£•+ <br /> .::t?v�rrlKd'�K•n.a:•:}M•f '?�q�yffpAR+fieN'::+ <br /> R1liA*:+px}Ty'+ <br /> a X.TP: .4.pr <br /> The subject property is surrounded by the other poi tiozis.; tterson Pass Business Park to <br /> the north, west and cast. At the time of the site recotnlaisiai .fl lot of the Patterson Pass <br /> Business Park, Lot 1, to the north of the Property was devefop ' ..a building, Lot 1 is <br /> srs r�ln <br /> occupied .industrial building p by a large g ng used•as '::W distribut? ;tg operation. The <br /> remaining lots are graded flat and/or have.*11iee '1'5'gi: ilding pads: <br /> The land to the south is occupied by:the California Aqu :.W iich is approximately 300 feet <br /> south of the Property, across an field easement. ; <br /> 6.5.2 Potential for Con alauat aa< m Adjacent Properdes <br /> .d.42:. 'x':12: <br /> 'i'lte ; nterstaiii ''ll Faclllty''(''forrr►erly located adjacent to the southeast of the <br /> reK}�:Ii�KN. d•i:rt v'i::b. •: ... <br /> opclr °'<" aped` - and had five 10,000-g on LJSf`s, , <br /> one 2004-gallon <br /> Pr '�;av��3eved + all UST, <br /> kY.L I•r' <br /> and one 5 ,i1ST. 7't :l mere removed in 1990 and minor soil coatut dnatlon was <br /> identified•, x„t d. Tlie' lity was issued a "clean closure” by SJCEHD. Two <br /> r..a r:: " <br /> rax iiateI �T w <br /> �!�,�}..• Y � ... s tare observed on the Trucking Facility Property during prior <br /> ito"b'dtions and minalr;s0 :was noted around the AM. Two wash drains were also observed <br /> ...4ad exhibited areas oiminoir staining. At the time of SECOR's site reconnaissance, no evidence <br /> 'of the former facility was observed} <br /> "'Used. on the•fftt that there is no documented impact to groundwater at the truck facility, this <br /> tl••I�,vN> <br /> ..•tih'•INM•.I S.. .} I I.• <br /> +d�ibrv:l I..n <br /> ..W'bxpected to impact the Property <br /> .�t.d11113•t.• <br /> •AJI� <br /> The ARCO facility located across Interstate 580,to the south of the Property was listed as having <br /> had a release from a UST. The release was confined to soil only and remediation is underway <br /> (soil vapor extraction). Based on the fact that groundwater has not been impacted, the ARCO <br /> facility is not expected to impact the Property. <br /> 1Mkwe-Deft=brXWwY.R0Lwpd <br /> ootobv 5119" <br /> SECaR Job No.007.15901.500 6-6 <br />