My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0000568 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SOUTHLAND
>
8908
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-91-94
>
SU0000568 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:27:48 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:17:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0000568
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-91-94
STREET_NUMBER
8908
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
SOUTHLAND
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
ENTERED_DATE
9/21/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8908 E SOUTHLAND RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\S\SOUTHLAND\8908\MS-91-94\SU0000568\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- File No. 20-3514-01 ~� KLEINFEL DER <br /> September 11, 1991 <br /> Classification System which is described on Plate A-2 of the <br /> appendix. <br /> LABORATORY TESTING <br /> Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples obtained from <br /> _ the borings in order to evaluate the moisture, density, and <br /> gradation characteristics of the soils encountered. The tests <br /> consisted of Moisture Content and Dry Density Determinations and <br /> a No. 200 Wash. In addition, one R-Value test was performed on <br /> a sample of the near-surface soils for use in pavement sections <br /> design. <br /> The results of the Moisture Content and Dry Density Determinations <br /> and the No. 200 Wash are noted on the Logs of Borings at the <br /> corresponding sample locations and are summarized on Plate A-7 of <br /> the appendix. The R-Value test result is presented on Plate A-8 <br /> of the appendix. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 1 . GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION <br /> A. General <br /> In our opinion, the proposed structures can be supported on the <br /> existing sandy soils, provided the soils are prepared as <br /> recommended in the following sections of this report. However, <br /> due to the reports of standing water on the site following heavy <br /> rains, especially on the south portion, the structures will likely <br /> have to be constructed on raised Engineered Fill pads. The height <br /> of the fill pads will have to be determined by the civil engineer <br /> and will be dependant on the site topography and current flood <br /> maps. In addition, if slab-on-grade floors are constructed, we <br /> recommend that french drain systems be constructed to minimize the <br /> flow of water beneath the structures. If raised floors are <br /> constructed over the Engineered Fill pads, the french drain <br /> systems can be eliminated. <br /> = Our recommendations for foundations, support of floor slabs, if <br /> used, site preparation and grading and pavements are presented in <br /> the following sections of this report. <br /> B. Foundations <br /> In our opinion, the structures can be supported on spread or <br /> continuous foundations bearing on the existing soils or on <br /> Engineered Fill. We recommend that foundations extend a minimum <br /> depth of 12 inches for one-story and 18 inches for two-story <br /> structures below the lowest adjacent finished soil subgrade, <br /> interior or exterior, whichever controls. We anticipate that very <br /> loose to medium dense soils will be exposed at the bottom of the <br /> majority of the foundation excavations. In order to provide more <br /> Copyright 1991 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 4 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.