Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 6 <br /> PC: 9-17-92 <br /> MS-92-147 <br /> Page 1 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny Minor Subdivision Application No. MS-92-147 <br /> because Finding Number 1 cannot be made. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. The proposed map is consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans. <br /> • This Finding cannot be made because the applicant Is offering the project parcel for <br /> sale while applying for a homesite parcel for a family member. The purpose of this <br /> provision of the ordinance Is to permit family members to finance homes on the family <br /> farm so they can work on the farm. <br /> 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable General and <br /> Specific Plans. <br /> • This Finding can be made because the design and Improvements meet the minimum <br /> standards contained In the General Plan as reflected In the tentative map. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development. <br /> • This Finding can be made because all development requirements In the County <br /> Planning Title and all minimum County standards are met. The parcels are large <br /> enough to provide on-site services. The homesite parcel meets the requirements of <br /> the Williamson Act, and all parcels have 100 feet of frontage. <br /> 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. <br /> • This Finding can be made because the number of parcels proposed Is consistent with <br /> the agricultural density of the General Plan. Land designated Agricutture In the <br /> General Plan requires five acres per dwelling unit. This subdivision averages 10 <br /> acres per dwelling unit. <br /> 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial <br /> environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. <br /> • This Finding can be made because no adverse environmental Impacts were Identified <br /> In the analysis of this project. No unique wildlife habitat has been identified on the <br /> project site. <br />