SU0002240 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I ATTACHMENT"A" I I Findings for Use Permit Application No. UP798 12; . r. 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, standards, and maps of the General Plan, any applicable Master,'Plan, Specific Plan, Special Purpose Platt, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. This finding can be made because communication towers may be "w conditionally permitted in.the RVL zone with an approved Use Permit application. 2. Adequate utilities, roadway improvements, sanitation, water supply, drainage, and ,other necessary facilities have been provided, and the'.proposed improvements are - . properly related to existing'and proposed roadways. • This finding can be made because no services are required. 4'.. .' Vit.. �-iy. -, .`,`— w. r < l � -.w: ♦ Y�.. r ._Y 4.i. .w - , t 3. .The site is physically suitable for.the type of development and for the intensity o€" development. : . r.~t • �> . • This finding can be made because the Plan demonstrates that all.., x requirements of the'zone can be meta T 4. Issuance of the permit will not be significantly detrimental to the.public health, ! safety, or welfare'or be injurious #o,the property`of impro.vements,of adjacent 'properties. F. . �O 41 • This finding cannot be-made because issuance of the permit would be - injurious to.the property and improvements of-adjacent properties for the following reasons: a. The tower will cause a blight on the horizon and a blight on the existing adjacent subdivision; and b. The tower will cause negative aesthetic impacts which will cause a decline in the quality of life. w 5. The use is compatible with adjoining land uses. • "This finding can net e made because the proposed communications tower will be incompatible with adjoining land uses for the following reasons: a. Not enough analysis of alternative sites was done. Not enough evidence was submitted into the record to substantiate that the proposed tower could not locate elsewhere; b. No evidence was submitted to substantiate why the tower could not be located at the football field at nearby Linden High School; and i c. silt effort has been made iQ makc -the tower less visually obtrusive. I r a ' A .. ' `Pg4 12?.