Laserfiche WebLink
�OHN EELERS FARMS <br /> 21355 Walnut Drive <br /> Linden, California 95236 <br /> April 27,1992 <br /> Steve St. Sure, Planner 19Q? <br /> San Joaquin County Planning Division <br /> 1810 East Hazelton <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 =+- •>> 1. :: , <br /> RE: Minor Subdivision MS-92-78 (E. & M. Marigliano) <br /> This Subdivision is not allowed under Williamson Act Contract. <br /> According to State Attorney General's Opinion No. 70-229, Vol. 54, Page 90, <br /> splitting off parcels under Williamson Act Contract solely for homesite purposes <br /> is to ". . . do the opposite of the purpose for which the California Land Conservation <br /> Act of 1965 was enacted." Further, " the most essential term of Williamson <br /> Act Contract is the provision, ' . . . for the exclusion of uses other than agriculture <br /> and those compatible with agriculture uses for the duration of the contract. ' <br /> Section 51243, subdivision (a) ." <br /> The Opinion summarizes, "We conclude that a determination by the board that <br /> the division of a 1200 acre farm into 20 acre homesites will result in a loss <br /> of production agricultural land, is a sufficient reason for the board to refuse <br /> to acquiesce in such division and to view any sales of such parcels as a breach <br /> of the land conservation contract." <br /> In a second Attorney General's Opinion No. 79-309, Vol.62, page 233, "Unless <br /> the single-family residences proposed for each of the subdivided lots are incidental <br /> to the use of the lot for the purpose of producing agricultural commodities <br /> for commercial purposes, the division of a 1308 acre preserve into 29 lots of <br /> varying acreage from 20 to 185 acres would constitute a violation of the Williamson <br /> Act contract binding on that land. It is the responsibility of the board of <br /> supervisors to make the determination of contract violation, and if it does <br /> so, it may sue to enjoin the sale of the lots or prevent the construction of <br /> such single-family residences; and . . . The underlying facts which constitute <br /> a violation of a Williamson Act contract may, however, also constitute grounds <br /> for disapproving the tentative subdivision map." <br /> In both Opinions cited above the splits were from 20 to 185 acres. The countys <br /> in question could easily deny the splits because it jeopardized the intent and <br /> letter of the Williamson Act. In this case a split down to 10 acres clearly <br /> creates a homesite which will never more be considered "production agriculture." <br /> The Williamson Act was created to protect "production agriculture." <br /> The present parcel size of 29 acres represents a small viable farm for production <br /> agriculture. To split it into 19 acres and 10 acres reduces it forever into <br /> merely homesites. There are many young farmers in Linden struggling to purchase <br />