My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0009195 (3)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TADDEI
>
151
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1200063
>
SU0009195 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:53 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:33:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0009195
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1200063
STREET_NUMBER
151
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
TADDEI
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
00317010 54
ENTERED_DATE
5/21/2012 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
151 W TADDEI RD
RECEIVED_DATE
5/18/2012 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\TADDEI\151\PA-1200063\SU0009195\REV EH COND 2.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\TADDEI\151\PA-1200063\SU0009195\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\TADDEI\151\PA-1200063\SU0009195\APPEAL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\TADDEI\151\PA-1200063\SU0009195\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> vineyard serves as a backdrop for "weddings, banquets, or small gatherings, anniversary <br /> parties, birthday celebrations, receptions, luncheons and social affairs, both formal and <br /> casual'as already advertised and conducted by the Vierras at their St. Jorge Winery. <br /> Land use activities not properly allowed under the San Joaquin County Code are <br /> not consistent with County's General Plan. <br /> B. 4. Reason#4 Why Finding 1 Is Wrong: The Proposed Project Is <br /> "Incompatible with the Ambiance of an Agricultural Area and the <br /> Production of Wine" <br /> The Code's intent is that its regulations for Wineries and Related Facilities are <br /> "designed to help the wine industry thrive ... while simultaneously discouraging or <br /> inhibiting on-going uses that would degrade or that would be incompatible with the <br /> ambiance of an agricultural area and the production of wine." The Winery's so-called <br /> "wine garden" is nothing of the sort, but rather is an "amphitheater" (and advertised as <br /> exactly that), designed, built and advertised for "summer concerts." This already- <br /> conducted activity, now proposed to be legitimized, is "incompatible with the ambiance of <br /> an agricultural area and the production of wine." <br /> If a proposed land use activity is not properly allowed under the San Joaquin <br /> County Code, then it is not consistent with "goals, policies, standards," etc. of County's <br /> General Plan. <br /> C. Finding 4 is Wrong <br /> C. 1. Finding 4 Reads: <br /> "4. Issuance of the permit will not be significantly detrimental to the public <br /> health, safety, or welfare, or be injurious to the property or improvements of <br /> adjacent properties. <br /> • This finding can be made because the Initial Study prepared for this <br /> project found no potentially significant environmental impacts. <br /> Mitigation measures from the noise study conducted by J.C. Brennan <br /> and Associates dated August 2, 2012 will be incorporated into <br /> Conditions of Approval to ensure any impacts to noise are less than <br /> significant. With these mitigation measures, the Initial Study <br /> concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the <br /> environment. As Conditions of Approval, the project must meet the <br /> noise ordinance requirements of 65 dB at the property line and have no <br /> more than 150 attendees at each marketing event." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.