Laserfiche WebLink
Table of Contents <br /> Comment Leiter,St. Jorge Winery Expansion Application <br /> I. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> A. Comment Letter is Submitted to Introduce Facts into the Record.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> B. Comment Letter is Submitted to Urge Appropriate Action be Taken.. . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> 1' County and State Laws Have Been Broken.. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 <br /> 2. Appropriate Action Includes Continuance,Revocation and Removal. . . . 1 <br /> C. Pertinent San Joaquin County Land Use Policy. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I <br /> D. The St.Jorge Winery Is and Has Been Operating Outside Its 2005 Permit <br /> ForYears. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 <br /> E. The St.Jorge Winery's Land Uses and Business Operations Are Contrary to <br /> San Joaquin County Code Land Use Policy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 <br /> F. The 2012 Expansion Application's Initial Study is Flawed.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> 1. Role of Initial Study in Permit Application.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 <br /> 2. Noise Study is Flawed . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> 3. Conclusions of"Less than Significant"Impacts Are Flawed. . . . . . . . . . .3 <br /> IL THE VIERRA'S 2005 ST.JORGE WINERY PERMIT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> A. The Vierra's 2005 St.Jorge Winery Application.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 <br /> 1. 2005"Application- Site Approval.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> 2. 2005 Building Proposal. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 <br /> B. The 2005 Permit's Terms.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 <br /> 1. The Development Department's"Conditions of Approval". . . . . . . . . . . .4 <br /> 2. The County's"Conditions of Approval"Allows Marketing Events <br /> "As Described in the Marketing Plan Dated May 18,2005.... . . . . . . . . . .4 <br /> 3. The 2005 Application's Required"Winery or Wine Cellar Supplemental <br /> Information and Marketing Plan"Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 <br /> 4. The 2005 Application's"Marketing Events"Information.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 <br /> C. 2005 Permit Terms.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 <br /> 1. The Permit's Terms Appear in Two Separate Documents. . - . . . . . . . . . .5 <br /> 2. Bullet List of Pertinent Permit Terms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 <br /> 3. Paragraph Form of Same Terms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 <br /> 4. The Combined Terms of the"Conditions of Approval"and the <br /> "Marketing Plan".. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 <br /> D. 2005 Permit Time Extension Granted in 2007. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 <br /> 1. The Development Department Grants a Time Extension for Compliance <br /> . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 <br /> 2. There is No Record of the Required Compliance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 <br /> 3. There is a History of Non-Compliance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 8 <br /> E. The Vierras Have Violated All of the St.Jorge Winery 2005 Permit's Pertinent <br /> Terms.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 <br /> i <br />