Laserfiche WebLink
,�ppJlry <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> J <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3rd Floor Stockton•CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420•Far:(209)464-0138 • Web:www.co.san-joaquin_ca.US/ehd <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: �7vv L /.3-l-A S, PA#: 0;Z <br /> REPORT DATE: <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905,Section 9-905-12 <br /> 1 - IasutTicient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> F1 ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all parcels),including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> F1 ❑ 1.2 Description of proposed development. <br /> 41 ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. A*,,.,u, , A <br /> El ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples:structures,drives,wells,septic systems, large trees, <br /> pastures,pools,natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways,etc.) :aF.ti, y ,' <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> El ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past,present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information:current and/or previous property owners,historical maps,insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications,etc.) p�,Z_ _/f/ <br /> A17u4,,a, Y A A' C <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> ❑ 3A Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search,EHD records search,agricultural <br /> chemical application search,site reconnaissance and survey,etc.) <br /> R ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and bek)w ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/storage/use,aboveground/underground tanks, <br /> septic systems,injection wells,unsealed wells,pondsAagoons,vehiclelmachine repair/painting, buried or <br /> stockpiled solid waste,etc.) P -� 4,9 " ; <br /> El ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site(see examples above). 12' -;�,) v,e if/-I,*-— ,sa-i s rc- *� <br /> El3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former gasoline station,in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact,etc.) nP,,rev S <br /> n ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential andlor known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site./'S �� vis f Who c."" tj � <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATIO IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> El ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified(n the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment_ This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> El <br /> 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e.collection of soiltwater samples)and/or mitigative measures(Le.,dean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. p Y <br /> ❑ F— V f r,,-i S{, fU,/ t�r.':ti��'r.+.v,rfv"ina r it/J 1- ,."A <br /> 5.2 The report was inclusive(.e.all information referenced was induded in this report-report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> FRI ❑ 5.3 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> r ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed B Reviewed Date: � 11.161 - <br /> Y: � <br /> EHD 2602-001 Page I o f 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14,1003 <br />