Laserfiche WebLink
omni • LN <br /> an61 NE ERS PLANNERS <br /> Eai <br /> January 21,2013 <br /> Mr.Chris Conklin <br /> The Grupe Company <br /> 3255 W.March Lane, Suite 400 <br /> Stockton, CA 95219 <br /> RE:Loves Travel Stops EIR-Project Alternatives Trip Generation Analysis <br /> Chris, <br /> This technical letter report has been prepared by OMNI-MEANS to provide a trip generation analysis <br /> associated with the proposed Loves Travel Stop project, located in San Joaquin County. The proposed <br /> project would be constructed on approximately 11.68 acres and would include 24 fueling stations, along <br /> with a 7,700 square-foot convenient store with attached 3,000 square-foot fast-food restaurants.The EIR <br /> prepared for the project, analyzed four alternative project concepts assuming the site would be partially <br /> developed with different uses other than the proposed travel center. Alternative 1, the no project <br /> alternative, includes certain land uses that are `allowed by right' under the CF-S zoning, covering 0.25 <br /> acres of land, with the remaining 11.43 acres left undeveloped. Alternative 2 includes development of a <br /> travel stop half the size of the proposed project covering approximately 5.84 acres of land, with the <br /> remaining 5.84 acres left undeveloped Alternative 3 includes a gas station with 12 fuel dispensing pumps <br /> and a convenience store, covering only 1.25 acres of land with the remaining 10.43 acres left <br /> undeveloped. Alternative 4 includes a small grocery store (7,700 square feet) and fast-food restaurant <br /> (3,000 square feet) uses, covering only 0.98 acres of land with the remaining 10.70 acres left <br /> undeveloped. <br /> REMAINING UNDEVELOPED AREA CALCULATIONS <br /> As identified in the previous section, the EIR alternatives analysis assumes only partial development of <br /> the proposed project site. Full development of the project site assuming similar uses as considered in the <br /> EIR alternatives analysis would yield significantly different trip generation as compared with the trip <br /> generation assumed in the EIR. Table 1 provides a tabular summary of project land uses area associated <br /> with the proposed project and the four alternatives analyzed in EIR, along with additional potential <br /> development quantities associated with full development of the site for each alternative. <br /> TABLE 1 <br /> PROJECT LAND DEVELOPMENT AREA <br /> iP:opesei Proizt`t 11 68 acres 0 acro t_ 0 sq.it. <br /> 7Alternative 1:No Project 0.25 acres 11.43 aces 127,125 sq.ft. i <br /> Alternative 2:Reduced Project Size11.68 acres 5.84 acres 5.48 arta 63,598 sq.ft. <br /> IAltemative 3:Combination Gasoline Station 125 acres 10.43 acres 113,583 sq.ft. <br /> Akemative 4:Retail&Fast Food 0.98 ages - 10.7 acres 116,495 sq.8 <br /> 943 Reserve Drive,Suite 100,Roseville,CA 95678 — (916)782-8688 fax(916)782-8689 <br /> ROSEVILLE REDDING VISALIA WALNUT CREEK <br /> EXHIBIT 2 <br />