My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005291
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TINNIN
>
23480
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500507
>
SU0005291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:36 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005291
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500507
STREET_NUMBER
23480
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
TINNIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
22611032
ENTERED_DATE
8/10/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
23480 S TINNIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/9/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\TINNIN\23480\PA-0500507\SU0005291\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\TINNIN\23480\PA-0500507\SU0005291\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\TINNIN\23480\PA-0500507\SU0005291\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\TINNIN\23480\PA-0500507\SU0005291\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Karla Kuhl <br /> September 15, 2005 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> other homesite parcels as described in subsection (2) may be created on any remaining <br /> parcels under contract for at least 10 years following creation of a homesite parcel <br /> pursuant to this section (section 66474(d)). <br /> Even if a subdivided parcel were to meet the presumptive minimum size, it may be <br /> found that the subdivision will result in residential development not incidental to the <br /> commercial agricultural use of the land, in which case the Board must deny approval of <br /> the tentative map or parcel map. The tentative map in this case shows a pad for a <br /> future residence on the remaining parcel and in addition to the existing residence on the <br /> proposed homesite parcel. <br /> The Williamson Act also prohibits subdivision for residential purposes. The overarching <br /> niirnnoo of+Hm 1AIdliomonn Arr+ is +n r•iirh "fha rnnirl nnrl virhinlh/ irroiiorcihla Inco of <br /> V- F--- v� uw •rnnw�wv�i i — w av -- uw Iul✓iu —I'u rn au uny nivrv�vi✓�v IW.a w <br /> agricultural land to residential and other developed uses"(Sierra Club v. City of <br /> Hayward (1981) 28 Cal. 3d 840, 850) and to protect farmland from conversion into <br /> "scattered, low density, single family subdivisions." (Honey Springs Homeowners Assn. <br /> v. Board of Supervisors (1984) 157 Cal. App. 3d 1122, at 1139). The Legislature, <br /> through enactment of Senate Bill 985, Chapter 1018, Statutes of 1999, Section 15, <br /> concurred with several Attorney General opinions and made declaratory of existing law <br /> the following: "In enacting Section 14 of this act . . .clarifying that a landowner's right to <br /> subdivide is subject to the Williamson Act . . . therefore, the subdivision of enrolled <br /> lands for residential purposes is prohibited by both the Williamson Act and by Section <br /> 66474.4 of the Government Code . . .." <br /> The Williamson Act's prohibition against subdividing contracted lands is not limited by its <br /> presumptive parcel size minimums. A subdivision's primary purpose of residential <br /> development and its negative impact on agricultural land use are more determinant <br /> factors. In one case, the Attorney General concluded, " . . . the division of 1308 acre <br /> preserve into 29 lots of varying acreage from 20 to 185 acres would constitute a <br /> violation of the Williamson Act . . ."(62 Ops. Att'y Gen 233, 241). "The subdivision of <br /> land which is subject to a Williamson Act contract would generally not serve the primary <br /> goal of the Williamson Act to promote the conservation of agricultural land"(Ops. Att'y <br /> Gen. No 92-708 (Dec. 1992), at 9, citing Government Code §51222; 62 Ops. Att'y Gen. <br /> 233, 241-242). <br /> If the landowner and County desire to develop buildable lots, we recommend that <br /> application approval be postponed until the land is out of contract. It is the County's <br /> responsibility to ensure that subdivision of Williamson Act land for residential purposes <br /> not occur. To address this issue, some counties have included "no build" provisions for <br /> Williamson Act parcel splits, and others have included agricultural income requirements <br /> for adequately sized parcels before additional houses could be built. Such conditions <br /> may protect both the property owner and the county from potential Williamson Act <br /> violations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.