Laserfiche WebLink
Identified Contamination Source Evaluation & Recommendations <br /> 7. Escalon Packers-(a.k.a. Esca(ort Premier The consultant reports on which Public <br /> Brands, Heinz), located at 1905 South Health Services based its decision were <br /> McHenry/,Avenue, is located adjacent to not available for review. Live Oak could <br /> the east of the project Site. This facility not determine the location, nature, or <br /> is listed by GeoTracker as,a LUST case extent of the contaminated soil. <br /> opene n 1987_and closed in 1992. It is Additionally, it is unclear whether all <br /> a Small uantity Hazardous Waste leaking USTs at the facility were <br /> Generator with past violations. addressed by the decision. There was <br /> According to a 2008 AST Inventory, 600 nothing in the file to suggest that <br /> gallons of oil, 440 gallons of gear oil, and contamination from this facility extended <br /> 275 gallons of waste oil are stored at the off-site. However, based on the limited <br /> facility. Two UST Unauthorized Release information available, we cannot <br /> forms were on file at EHD, one from conclusively rule out the possibility that <br /> 1991 involving crude motor oil and one the subject Site may have been impacted <br /> from 1986 involving petroleum by contamination from this facility. <br /> hydrocarbons noted during the removal <br /> of a 550-gallon tank; the paperwork from <br /> 1991 requests further site assessment to <br /> determine the nature and extent of <br /> contamination. Records from 1991 <br /> indicate that one 10,000-gallon and one <br /> 16,500-gallon fuel oil tank were removed <br /> or closed in place. Based on Public <br /> Health Services correspondence in the <br /> file from 1992 and 1993, it appears <br /> access to the impacted area was limited. <br /> Contaminated soil was left in place at <br /> this facility after a leachability test was <br /> performed to assess the threat to <br /> groundwater quality; the test indicated <br /> that the contamination would not <br /> become mobile under normal site <br /> conditions. (Past off-site) <br /> 8. EHD data indicates that one well just It appears that some groun t�� the <br /> over one-quarter mil fr�}the Site was area is contaminated �nd <br /> tested for nitrate and DBCP was nitrate at levels above a MCL. hould <br /> detected in the well at a concentration of the owners wish to us well wat r on the <br /> 1.9 parts per billion (ppb). Nitrate as Site for domestic purposes, it is <br /> NO3 was detected in the well at recommended that a sample be collected <br /> concentration of 74 parts per million and analyzed for these constituents. <br /> (ppm). The Maximum Contaminant <br /> Level (MCL) set by the US EPA for <br /> DBCP is 0.2 ppb; the MCL for nitrate is <br /> 45 ppm. (Current and past off-site) <br /> LOGE 1109 <br /> Page 8 <br />