Laserfiche WebLink
SAN-JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONT MENTAL HEALTH DEPA I M_bN I <br /> h '1 304 E Weber Avenue P Floor Stockton-CA 95202-2708 <br />'h • �' - J1 ,.(209)468-3420•Far.(209)454-0138. Web:Www.co,.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: S PA#: <br /> REPORT DATE: ZZ <br /> 2 p <br /> 5: SufficInsufficient ic <br /> nt <br /> 1 San Joaquln County Development Title Chapter 9-905,Section 9-905.12. <br /> a lasu <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION& PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> y� ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all parcels),including current and/or proposed zoning information. l� / <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of proposed development..Pit d <br /> ❑ / a <br /> 1.3 Parcel location map. <br /> ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples:structures,drives,wells,septic systems,large trees, <br /> pastures,pools,natural drainage courses,ponds,waterways,etc.) <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> �L.J ❑ I <br /> 2.1 Discussion of past,present and proposed future uses at the site In assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information:current andlor previous property owners,historical maps,insurance maps,previous land use <br /> applications,etc") <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. .(Examples: Database search,EHD records search,agricultural. <br /> chemical application search,site reconnaissance and survey,etc.) <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at,the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemicat handfng/storagefuse,aboveground/undergro(ind tanks, <br /> septic systems,injection wells,unsealed wells,ponds/lagoons,vehidelmachine repairlpainling,buried or <br /> stockpiled solid waste,etc.) <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential andfor known above and below ground sources of contamination o; .Z— <br /> identified at the project site(see examples above). <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination Identified <br /> in the area of the project site.that'has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former gasoline station,in'area of known DSCHN"te groundwater impact.etc.) <br /> ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination/ 9� <br /> identified in the area of the project site. <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATIO IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION ' <br /> ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified(n the above section)for any real p`f <br /> andfor potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as areal or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats idenViied. Reoommendations may Include Z <br /> additional site assessment(.e.coAection of soiUwater samples)andfor mitigative measures{i.e.,dean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for Implementation. <br /> ❑ 5-2 The report was inclusive(i.e.all information referenced was included in this report report should not reference � <br /> other reports). 3 <br /> ❑ 5.3 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. lvo - r, <br /> ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> r <br /> ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appe ces contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. � <br /> °Revie«ed By: . Reviewed Date: <br /> EHD 7"2-00 1 Page 1 of 2 suftsce&sub Checklist <br />