Laserfiche WebLink
SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY 4 <br /> REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST <br /> San Joaquin County Development Title <br /> Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 L <br /> PA#: <br /> S=Suffioient �y <br /> 1=lnsufflcient SITE LOCATION: V� REPORT DATE:� �*� <br /> lYJ ❑ J <br /> INTRODUCTION 8 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ra+ Description of site, including zoning information. <br /> n[� ❑ Description of proposed development. <br /> Vr❑ Parcel location map. <br /> Site map showing location of all items on parcel (structures, drives,wells se tics stems, large trees pastures I <br /> ❑ p Y g . <br /> pools, natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways,etc. "- <br /> PRESENT AND PAST USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> ❑ Discussion of past and present uses at the site to assess potential problems. <br /> j <br /> EXISTING AND PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK USAGE SECTION <br /> Description of existing septic tank usage on site (system types, age,functioning/repair rates). <br /> �❑ Site septic permit history(number/types/dates of permits, age of system, permit numbers,copies in report). <br /> ❑ Discussion of on-site septic tank repair history. <br /> ❑ Description of existing septic tank usage in the general area (system types, ages,function ing/re pair rates, proximity to <br /> parcel). <br /> �❑ General area septic permit history(number/types/dates of permits, age of system, permit numbers, copies in <br /> ❑ report). <br /> Discussion of general area septic tank repair history. <br /> ❑ ❑ Description of proposed or expected maximum (including second unit dwellings)septic tank usage on site. <br /> GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SECTION <br /> ❑ Description of the depth and gradient of groundwater in the general area <br /> 2r E] Descriptionidiscussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the l �enerai location of the site. <br /> ❑ Description of location (a_ddress/APN),type and construction of well, and location(well head/kitchen tap)where <br /> water samples were obtained. � �, � �— <br /> ❑ Description of constituents being tested for in the water sample. <br /> ❑ Description of how sample was obtained, handled,stored, and transported to the lab.. <br /> ❑ ❑ Complete Chain of Custody document,including printed and signed name of thirda sam ler, condition of <br /> ,_12sample, and date and time the sample was submitted to the lab. <br /> SOIL PROFILE INFORMATION SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ Site map showing the location,with dimensions,of the soil profile Aon the parcel. <br /> ❑ Description of soil profile pit including depth and dimensions. <br /> �'❑ Description of soil lithology as noted from test pit by appropriate professional using industry standard protocol. <br /> ❑ ❑ Discussion of soil lithology as related to future onsite septic uses. <br /> PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION SECTION <br /> ❑ Site map showing the location,with concise and accurate dimensions,of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br /> The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests were performed for each parcel. <br /> ❑ Description of the date,time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including depth and dimensions of hole, <br /> preparation of hole, and depth of water used to presoak(minimum 12 inches). -716 <br /> ❑ Description of the date,time and condition of the test hole after the 24 hour soak period (hole still intact, 6�edrmy, <br /> epth to water remaining in hole,etc.). <br /> ❑ The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02 (correct depth, diameter,2"gravel, 6"water refill, correct readings <br /> recorded). <br /> �❑ Complete (including readings)Percolation Test�RF rrm was provided with REHS{verification signature. The rate was <br /> ` correctly calculated using the last reading. M r 0_ <br /> Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/ori the need for an engineered or alternative septic system. <br /> [. ❑ Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type and size of future leach fields needed at the site. <br /> CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> ❑ The report was sign d and stamped by the appropriately registered individual. OutVA4 a <br /> REVIEWED BY: <br /> REVIEWED DATE: <br />