Laserfiche WebLink
1�DERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC—) } <br /> �oeRs� �NEIL 0. � <br /> GEOTECHN-ICAL-ENVIRONMENTAL•GROUNDWATER•INSPECTIONS= TESTING•LABORATORY SERVICES <br /> D H WEBSITE: www.noanderson.com CORPORATE OFFICE <br /> AU EMAIL: noarQrnoanderson.comSACRAMENTO OFFICE <br /> Lodi,California 95240-2405 <br /> 22 Houston Lane 4221 Northgate Boulevard,Suite 6 <br /> O /� CHICp: (530}89]-6304 <br /> qs,S O GAP STOCKTON: (209)472-1091 Sacramento,California 95834-1227 <br /> RANCHO CORDOVA: (916)631-4455 (209)367-3701 (916)929-9267 <br /> FAX(209)333-8303 FAX:(916)929-9269 <br /> n15777 <br /> September 16, 2003 SEP 1 8 2003 <br /> Transmitted by Facsimile and First-Class Mail <br /> ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Mr. Mike Huggins <br /> San Joaquin County, Environmental Health Department <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor <br /> Stockton, California 95202 <br /> RE: <br /> Addendum to Soil Suitability Study for 627 W__. Yerna�is_R.d.,Tracy --�. .� <br /> LaUse Application#MS-01-29 <br /> Report Dated July 29, 2003 <br /> Mr.Huggins: <br /> Pursuant to your letter dated September 10, 2003, we have prepared this addendum to the above- <br /> referenced Soil Suitability Study. Sections referenced relate to the Soil Suitability Study <br /> Requirements Checklist, dated July 14, 2003: <br /> • Section 4.3: The water well that was sampled is the "Existing Well'indicated in Plate 2 <br /> of the appendix to the report. As indicated on page 4 of the report, the water samples <br /> were collected from the well head. <br /> • Section 4.6: The July 8, 2003 date for water sample collection indicated on page 4 of the <br /> report is a typographical error. The correct date for water sample collection is that <br /> indicated on the "Chain of Custody"document and the laboratory reports, July 10, 2003. <br /> We regret this error and will strive to avoid future such errors. <br /> Section 6.3: Twelve inches of water were used to presoak the percolation test hole on <br /> July 7, 2003. Six inches of water were used to start the percolation test. <br /> • Section 6.8: Page 7 of the report should read, `Based on the results of this study, our <br /> office has found the soils to be suitable for a standard septic system with leach lines for <br /> the tested areas of the site." We understand that seepage pits are not appropriate to soil <br /> conditions in the Tracy,area based on San Joaquin County regulations. <br /> 7 1 <br /> 1 <br /> z +r <br /> p h <br /> ,S 5 C G♦ <br /> Y <br />