Laserfiche WebLink
7a California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> Linda S.Adams Arnold <br /> Secretaryfor Schwarzenegger <br /> Environmental Sacramento Main Office Governor <br /> Prorechon 11020 Sun Center Drive 11200,Rancho Cordova,California 95670-61.14 <br /> Phone(916)464-3291 •FAX(916)464-4645 <br /> http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/ceniralvalley <br /> nD <br /> WEPE�WED '14 December 2006 <br /> Ben Hall, Director <br /> Environmental Services and Programs DEC 1 '9 2006 <br /> Musco Family Olive Company, <br /> 17950 Via Nicolo SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Tracy, CA 95377-9767 EIIViRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT <br /> AMENDED CONCEPTUAL COMPLIANCE PLAN, MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE COMPANY AND <br /> THE-STUDLEY COMPANY, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, WASTE DISCHARGE <br /> REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. R5-2002-0948 <br /> We have reviewed your Amended Conceptual Compliance Plan (Compliance Plan), dated <br /> 13 September 2006. The Compliance Plan examined potential compliance options, including <br /> the use of NyPa Forage to achieve a net reduction of salts in site soils, source reduction, a new <br /> process, enhanced evaporation, the use of NyPa Forage as a bio-fuel, discharge to the City of <br /> Tracy's wastewater treatment plant, and direct discharge to the Sacramento River from the <br /> Orland facility. The Compliance Plan also contained several requests. Specifically, the Plan <br /> requested an extension of the deadline for compliance with final effluent limitations under <br /> Cleanup and Abatement Order No. R5-2002-0149, a response to the 15 August 2003 <br /> Assimilative Capacity Workplan, and separate regulation of inorganic and organic dissolved <br /> solids. These requests are under review and will be addressed separately. <br /> i <br /> In general, we appreciate Musco's efforts with respect to source control and encourage Musco <br /> to focus its resources on those.elementslcompliance measures fully within Musco's control, <br /> e.g., source reduction and the proposed enhanced evaporation systems. Compliance <br /> measures outside of Musco's full control (e.g., cogeneration facility, discharge to other <br /> locations) lack an acceptable measure of certainty. The Regional Water Board has recently <br /> expressed serious concerns about increasing salt loading to the Delta. Discharges of process <br /> wastewater of the current quality from the Musco facility either to the City of Tracy's _ <br /> wastewater treatment plant (if discharging to surface water) or to the Sacramento River (or one <br /> of its tributaries) would result in increased salt loads to the Delta. Musco representatives <br /> acknowledged, during our 4 October 2006 meeting, that a discharge to the City of Tracy's <br /> wastewater treatment plant would require pretreating process wastewater to a level <br /> comparable to what would be achieved had the proposed reverse osmosis treatment been <br /> implemented. The Compliance Plan does not address this issue. <br /> The Compliance Plan stated that Musco plans to use NyPa Forage to remove sodium and <br />{ chloride from site soils. The NyPa Forage would be harvested and sold as cattle feed, thereby <br /> removing the salt from site soils. The Compliance Plan referenced the NyPa Distichlis <br /> Cultivars: Rehabilitation of Highly Saline Areas for Forage Turf and Grain <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Recycled Paper <br /> i <br />