Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Benjamin Hall - 4 - 12 July 1999 <br /> In our review of the reclamation project report, I have noticed that surface water samples were not <br /> collected. The sample location for surface water is designated as "the most downgradient point of flow <br /> to the property boundary south of ponds A and B (surface impoundments)." This location is the same as <br /> that designated for surface water sampling under the WDRs for the surface impoundments. Some of the <br /> monitoring parameters vary based on the differences in the wastestrearns for the impoundments versus <br /> the reclamation water. With the construction of the tailwater ponds, which intercept the limited runoff <br /> from the irrigated fields, the downstream sampling point is no longer applicable to the reclamation <br /> project. The MRP for the reclamation project will be revised to reflect the presence of the tailwater <br /> ponds and to require that sampling of the field runoff be conducted at the tailwater ponds. You indicated <br /> that other revisions to the MRP might be necessary. If�vou would like to have any other revisions <br /> considered for incorporation to the revised MRP,please include your proposed revision in a letter to me <br /> I look forward to working on the Musco Olive Products, Inc. projects. If you have any questions, please <br /> telephone me at (916) 255-3140. <br /> Wendy . Arano <br /> Associate Engineering Geologist <br /> Attachment- Standard Provisions and Reporting Requirements <br /> cc. Mr. Ed Padilla, San Joaquin County, Department of Public Health, Stockton, California <br /> WWA <br /> c:/projects/sanjoaquin/musco/98&99cmt.doc <br />