My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005837 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VICTORY
>
16411
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500829
>
SU0005837 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:48 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:59:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0005837
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500829
STREET_NUMBER
16411
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
VICTORY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
OAKDALE
APN
22922030
ENTERED_DATE
12/21/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
16411 S VICTORY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
12/20/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\V\VICTORY\16411\PA-0500829\SU0005837\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L <br /> LJune 1,2006 <br /> NOA Project Number: E05148B <br /> L6.7 Discussion of Percolation Test Results <br /> The soils within the sewage disposal areas of the parcels have demonstrated a satisfactory <br /> Lpercolation rate in accordance with the requirements of the EHD for the use of a standard septic <br /> system. <br /> L6.8 Discussion of Septic System Sizing <br /> Septic System Construction should follow the San Joaquin County On-Site Wastewater Disposal <br /> LStandardr where applicable. <br /> L 7.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> In summary,percolation rates that meet the minimum EHD standards were achieved in the <br /> proposed septic disposal areas of the site. The parcels appear suitable for the use of a standard septic <br /> L system. <br /> LNo ground water was encountered in any of the borings drilled on the property. No well water <br /> sample was taken because no wells exist on the property. <br /> L 8.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> L The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the existing and <br /> proposed development,the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the <br /> time we excavated our test holes and performed the percolation tests. It was assumed that the test <br /> L holes and percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> Our professional services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in <br /> accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of <br /> L all other warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional <br /> opinion do not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> LNEIL O.ANDERSON drASSOC.,INC. <br /> L . <br /> N cy Rosule , B. (Lelch,Principal Geologist <br /> LS ff Scientist CEG-2151,CHG-653, PGP-104 NAL Fpe <br /> o� DAVID J.WELCH J� <br /> N0.2151 <br /> CERTIFIED <br /> g ENGINEERING <br /> GEOLOGIST �P <br /> SOF CAUF� <br /> L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.