My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0009787 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST RIPON
>
13391
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1300173
>
SU0009787 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:34:13 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 11:05:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0009787
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1300173
STREET_NUMBER
13391
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WEST RIPON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
Zip
95366-
APN
22817038
ENTERED_DATE
10/7/2013 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13391 E WEST RIPON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
10/4/2013 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\W\WEST RIPON\13391\PA-1300173\SU0009787\SS_NL STUDY .PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 2` ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> e: <br /> w; <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> �L Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: PA#: <br /> / YG✓rc 'i f/")i Jrr / REPORT DATE: <br /> q <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> [3" ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> 3 <br /> 2 ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> 9[ ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. IV <br /> ® ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> / �f <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> F1, ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ® ❑ 3.2 Description impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> F] 3.3 Description of ll current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sces to the project site. <br /> 0 r-13.4 DescriptioA of Al proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> 61 <br /> [71 ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> e <br /> �] ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> [ ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> I V <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or in other constituent of concern,at and/or around the orolect site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation two support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: /�,Q�l i<y�a.-�a� �7— .Reviewed Date: 5/4 <br /> ' ' <br /> EHD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.