Laserfiche WebLink
AMW <br /> APN 01 1-160-01/PA5500109 <br /> Re: Ltr. Dtd. 6-24-05, EHD, SJC Sec.6.7, EHD Fm.26-02-001 <br /> Subject: Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or <br /> alternative septic system. <br /> A new well is to be placed in service on the SFR site. The water test of the new well for DBCP <br /> and Nitrates will be an indicator of the extent of the "dairy operation"problem. Several septic <br /> systems are being installed worldwide that purport to present an effluent meeting secondary <br /> treatment standards. <br /> One system that has been in use for several years is the packed bed filter. (Either textile or specific <br /> type of sand medium) <br /> Until the test results of the new well are available it is guessing to make any statement defining the <br /> Nitrate situation. It is probable the dairy site has created a situation where some shallow wells <br /> contain Nitrates above the 45mg/L in an unknown radius of the site. Most of the area affected <br /> may be to the west of the site.(downstream).There are few residences in the area. <br /> If the assumption, that the chief polluter was the dairy, is correct, then the problem has been <br /> removed. The affects linger and may be present for many years. It is probably a stretch to say one <br /> new SFR is going to make much of a difference in the Nitrate situation. If 100 homes were <br /> proposed in the area it would be a different scenario. Suffice to say systems are now being <br /> installed to reduce the level of Nitrates. etc to an acceptable level in single family homes. <br /> An article Performance of Packed Bed Filters by Terry Bounds, Eric Ball and Harold Ball is <br /> included for your information. A recent seminar by COWA in Chico presented additional <br /> information on the favorable results of the packed bed filters. It may be time for SJC to <br /> permit/require in certain areas, state of the art systems as the construction of SFR's is not going <br /> to stop in the rural areas of the county. (My opinion). Secondary treatment levels of effluent <br /> appear available at a cost to the homeowner of probably 2.5 to 3.5 times the,cost of a-atmdard <br /> system. The areas new existing dairies are probably in the same situation as the area around the <br /> former Simoes Dairy site. <br /> SUMMARY <br /> Testing of the new well that supports the proposed SFR on a regular basis, say 6 month intervals, <br /> WS 44WI N'th high bansam*ed and tested <br /> ui-Q=or more of the residences after reverse osmosis equipment is installed. These conditions <br /> should be part of the conditions of approval for the new septic system. <br /> I. <br />