SU0005984 SSCRPT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

APN: 0I 7-100-09,12 #1 The leak was detected by visual inspection. The fuel tank was observed during the field review and the soil indicates no recent leak. 42 Leak detected by pressure test. Location not observed in field 1 43 Method of leak detection not stated. Site not observed in field. State and Local documents were searched for the above three sites and none were listed. In the absence of any current listings the sites are considered to have been cleaned up and leaks corrected. The three sites were listed as HIST UST. j' The Agricultural Commissioner's Office was contacted for any record of chemical use during the past 5 years. The chemical use records for the past 5 years were obtained and are included n the y report. The various chemicals were applied on 4 to 80 acres as shown. ✓ The soil description in the EDR report indicates coarse grained soils, (Tokay), with a permeability rate of 2 to 6 inches/hour. The soil appears to be free from clay. The CVRWQCB list does not show any listing on Crump or Woodbridge Roads. The EHD, S.IC list USTSMDL has no listings on either of the two roads. The field review was conducted on 812/05. The photographs show the above ground fuel tank, the typical vineyard view, the driveway at 6908 E. Woodbridge and some of the stored equipment. The site is clean. No piles of trash or "collectibles" exist within view. The Map, Lines of Equal Depth to Groundwater, Spring `99 indicate approximately 50' to static water. The 70' contour line runs thru the parcel. Y There are no current on/off site potential and/or known above or below ground sources of contamination identified with the project. EVALUATION OF PAST/CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED AT OR IN THE STUDY AREA ; RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION The continued use of the property, in conformance with existing State and Local guidelines and regulations, should not produce any threat to human health and/or the environment.