My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:41:30 AM
Creation date
9/25/2019 4:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1599
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.1 AIR QUALITY <br /> is representative of conditions in the northern portion of San Joaquin County.13 This area <br /> includes the project site. The SJVAB consists of a continuous intermountain valley <br /> approximately 250 miles long and averaging 80 miles wide. On the western edge of the <br /> Valley is the Coast Mountain range,with peaks reaching over 5,000 feet, and on the east side <br /> is the Sierra Nevada range with some peaks exceeding 14,000 feet. The Tehachapi Mountains <br /> form the southern boundary of the Valley. Terrain is open only at the northern end of the <br /> valley. Both the project site and the monitoring site are located near the northern end of the <br /> San Joaquin Valley, in the broad,flat center of the valley. There are no nearby large terrain <br /> features, such as hills or mountain ranges,to affect local wind flow patterns. Prevailing <br /> winds in the northern end of the valley are from the west through northwest on an annual <br /> basis,although there is a strong southeasterly component during the fall and winter months <br /> (see Appendix B for wind roses). Both the project site and the monitoring site are affected by <br /> the marine air that generally flows into the basin from the San Joaquin River Delta to the <br /> north. Based on these factors,we concur with SJVAPCD's conclusion that the wind direction <br /> and wind speed data collected at the Stockton meteorological monitoring stations are similar <br /> to the dispersion conditions at the project site and to the regional area. Thus,the Stockton <br /> meteorological data set satisfies the definition of representative data. <br /> Representativeness has also been defined in the"Workshop on the Representativeness of <br /> Meteorological Observations" (Nappo et. al., 1982) as"the extent to which a set of <br /> measurements taken in a space-time domain reflects the actual conditions in the same or <br /> different space-time domain taken on a scale appropriate for a specific application." <br /> Representativeness is best evaluated when sites are climatologically similar,as are the project <br /> site and the Stockton meteorological monitoring station. Representativeness has additionally <br /> been defined in the PSD Monitoring Guideline (EPA, 1987a) as data that characterize the air <br /> quality for the general area in which the proposed project would be constructed and <br /> operated. As discussed above,because of the relative proximity of the Stockton <br /> meteorological data site to the proposed project site,the same large-scale topographic <br /> features that influence the meteorological data monitoring station also influence the <br /> proposed project site in the same manner. <br /> 5.1.5.6 Screening Modeling Analysis <br /> To ensure the impacts analyzed were for maximum emission levels and worst-case <br /> dispersion conditions, a screening procedure was used to determine the inputs to the impact <br /> modeling for the new gas turbine. The screening procedure is used to identify the CTG/ <br /> HRSG operating conditions that would result in the maximum impacts on a <br /> pollutant-specific basis. The operating conditions examined in this screening analysis, along <br /> with their exhaust and emission characteristics, are shown in Appendix 5.1B,Table 5.1B-2. <br /> These operating conditions represent CTG operation at maximum, average, and minimum <br /> ambient operating temperatures (107.7°F,61.2°F and 23.7°F), and at full load,peak load (with <br /> duct firing), and minimum load (50 percent). <br /> Ambient impacts for each of the 9 operating cases were modeled using EPA's AERMOD <br /> model and 5 years of Stockton meteorological data, as described above. The results of the <br /> unit impact analysis are presented in Appendix 5.1B,Table 5.1B-3 and summarized in <br /> Table 5.1-26. The analysis showed that for short-term averaging periods,modeled impacts <br /> 13 SJVAPCD,"Guidance for Dispersion Modeling,"Working Draft,Rev 2.0,January 2007,p.49.Available at <br /> http://www.valleyair.org/busind/pto/Tox_Resources/Modeling%20Guidance%20W_O%20 Pic.pdf. <br /> SAC/371322/082410013(LEC_5.1_AIR_QUALITY.DOC) 5.1-37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.