Laserfiche WebLink
5.1C:EVALUATION OF BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY <br /> The ammonia emissions resulting from the use of SCR may have another environmental <br /> impact through their potential to form secondary particulate matter such as ammonium <br /> nitrate. Because of the complex nature of the chemical reactions and dynamics involved in <br /> the formation of secondary particulates,it is difficult to estimate the amount of secondary <br /> particulate matter that will be formed from the emission of a given amount of ammonia. <br /> However, the SJVAPCD has stated that because of high background levels of ammonia,the <br /> formation of ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate in the San Joaquin Valley air basin <br /> is limited by the formation of nitrates and sulfates and not driven by the amount of <br /> ammonia in the atmosphere. Therefore, ammonia emissions from the proposed SCR system <br /> are not expected to contribute significantly to the formation of secondary particulate matter <br /> within the SJVAPCD. <br /> A second potential environmental impact that may result from the use of SCR involves the <br /> storage and transport of anhydrous ammonia. Although ammonia is toxic if swallowed or <br /> inhaled and can irritate or burn the skin,eyes,nose, or throat,it is a commonly used <br /> material that is typically handled safely and without incident and is already being stored <br /> and used at the existing STIG#2 plant. As discussed in Section 2.0, the project will utilize <br /> the existing ammonia delivery system,which consists of an ammonia storage tank,spill <br /> containment basin, and refilling station with a spill containment basin and sump—new <br /> ammonia storage facilities will not be constructed as part of the proposed project. NCPA is <br /> already required to maintain a Risk Management Plan(RMP) and to implement a Risk <br /> Management Program to prevent accidental releases of ammonia. The RMP will be updated <br /> to include use of ammonia at the LEC (see Section 5.5 of the AFC). The RMP provides <br /> information on the hazards of the substance handled at the facility and the programs in <br /> place to prevent and respond to accidental releases. The accident prevention and emergency <br /> response requirements reflect existing safety regulations and sound industry safety codes <br /> and standards. Thus,the potential environmental impact due to anhydrous ammonia use at <br /> the LEC is minimal and does not justify the elimination of SCR as a control alternative. <br /> Regeneration of the EMx catalyst is accomplished by passing hydrogen gas over an isolated <br /> catalyst module. The hydrogen gas is generated by reforming steam, so additional steam <br /> would be required beyond that for which the project is designed. This would require an <br /> increase in the size of the auxiliary boiler as well as an increase in expected boiler operation <br /> and emissions. <br /> 5.1C.1.1.1.2 Achieved in Practice Evaluation <br /> While there are no formal"achieved in practice' criteria in the SJVAPCD,the SCAQMD has <br /> established formal criteria for determining when emission control technologies should be <br /> considered achieved in practice (AIP) for the purposes of BACT determinations. The criteria <br /> include the elements outlined below. <br /> • Commercial Availability: At least one vendor must offer this equipment for regular or <br /> full-scale operation in the United States. A performance warranty or guarantee must be <br /> available with the purchase of the control technology, as well as parts and service. <br /> • Reliability: All control technologies must have been installed and operated reliably for <br /> at least six months. If the operator did not require the basic equipment to operate daily, <br /> then the equipment must have at least 183 cumulative days of operation. During this <br /> period,the basic equipment must have operated (1) at a minimum of 50% design <br /> SAC/371322/082330016(LEC_5.1 C_APPEN D IKI)OC) 5.1 C 4 <br />