My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:41:30 AM
Creation date
9/25/2019 4:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1599
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX 5.1D <br /> Screening Health Risk Assessment <br /> The screening level health risk assessment has been prepared using CARB's Hotspots <br /> Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP) computer program(Version 1.4,May 2008) <br /> and associated guidance in the OEHHA's Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual <br /> for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (August 2003). The HARP model was used to <br /> assess cancer risk as well as chronic and acute risk impacts. The following paragraphs <br /> describe the procedures used to prepare this risk assessment. <br /> Modeling Inputs <br /> The risk assessment module of the HARP model was run using unit ground level <br /> impacts to obtain derived cancer risks for each toxic chemical of interest.? Cancer risks <br /> for residential receptors were obtained for the derived (OEHHA) method,while the <br /> derived (adjusted) method was used to derive risks for workers. The HARP model <br /> output was cancer risk by pollutant and route for each type of analysis,based on an <br /> exposure of 1.0 pg/m3. HARP model output showing the unit values is included as <br /> Attachment 5.1D-1. Individual cancer risks are expressed in units of risk per Pg/m3 of <br /> exposure. To calculate the weighted risk for each source,the annual average emission <br /> rate in g/s for each pollutant was multiplied by the individual cancer risk for that <br /> pollutant in(µg/m3)-1. The resulting weighted cancer risks for each pollutant were then <br /> summed for the source. An identical approach was used to determine the acute and <br /> chronic health impacts associated with the proposed project. Details of the calculations <br /> of risk"rates" for modeling are shown in Tables 5.1D-2 through 5.1D-5 (provided at the <br /> end of this section). <br /> Risk Analysis Method <br /> The results of the turbine screening analysis (see Appendix 5.1B,Table 5.0-3) were used <br /> to determine the worst-case full load operating conditions for modeling for the annual <br /> and 1-hour averaging periods,used in determining cancer risk and chronic HHI,and <br /> acute HHI,respectively. The total weighted risk"rate" for each source was used in <br /> place of emission rates in the modeling analysis. The weighted risk"rates" used for the <br /> HRA modeling are summarized in Table 5.1D-6 (at the end of this section). The <br /> calculated value was then total cancer risk at each receptor. As discussed in Section <br /> 5.1.5.6,the screening analysis for the criteria pollutant modeling analysis was performed <br /> using the AERMOD model,the 2000 through 2004 Stockton meteorological data,and <br /> specific receptor grids. The exhaust characteristics for the highest full-load annual <br /> average unit impact from the screening analysis, Case 7,was used to model cancer risks <br /> from the CTG/HRSG for the proposed project. <br /> The contribution of each toxic compound to total cancer risk and total HHI for each <br /> analysis method was then determined using the individual contribution of each <br /> compound to the total weighted risk"rate." <br /> Procedure is described in Part B of Topic 8 of the HARP How-To Guides: How to Perform Health Analyses <br /> Using a Ground Level Concentration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.