Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDIX 5.1F <br /> Offsets and Interpollutant Offset Ratio <br /> Analysis <br /> Under District Rule 2201,LEC must provide offsets for the portion of the facility <br /> emissions after modification that exceed the SJVAPCD offset thresholds. Because the <br /> proposed project is a modification to an existing stationary source,the calculation of the <br /> offset requirements must account for the emissions from the existing NCPA Lodi <br /> facility. Table 5.1F-1 shows annual proposed potential to emit from the new LEC units, <br /> the annual potential to emit for the existing units,and the total emissions from the <br /> combined facility after modification,and compares these totals with the offset <br /> thresholds to determine the offsets required for the project. <br /> TABLE 5.1 F-1 <br /> Offset Requirements for the LEC <br /> Annual Emissions, tons <br /> NOx sox VOC PM10 <br /> LEC Project Emissions 71.5 24.3 17.5 44.0 <br /> Pre-Existing PTE 20.4 5.7 25.9 8.8 <br /> Rule 2201 Offset Threshold 10.0 27.4 10.0 14.6 <br /> Emissions Required to be <br /> Offset 71.5 2.7 17.5 38.2 <br /> District Rule 2201 allows the APCO to approve interpollutant offsets on a case-by-case <br /> basis. LEC proposes to use the excess SO2 ERCs as offsets for Mo. The interpolllutant <br /> offset ratio analysis in Attachment 5.1F-1 demonstrates that ratio of 1.11 tons of SO2 for 1 <br /> ton of PMlo will provide equivalent air quality benefits as required under the NSR rules. <br /> The required quarterly calculation of offsets is provided in Table 5.1F-2. This calculation <br /> demonstrates that more than sufficient offsets are being provided to achieve the no net <br /> increase provision of the District NSR rule (Rule 2201 §1.0). <br /> Table 5.1F-3 provides a demonstration that sufficient mitigation is being provided under <br /> CEQA. Table 5.1F-4 provides documentation regarding the location and method of <br /> reduction for each ERC certificate proposed to be used for the project. <br />