My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:41:30 AM
Creation date
9/25/2019 4:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1599
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Determining an Offset Ratio <br /> Reductions of precursor pollutants as offsets for the pollutant being formed have been <br /> approved by the SJVAPCD for other major projects. See Attachment 5.1G-1.1 for two <br /> examples of approved offset ratio calculations (SO2 for PM10 and NOx for PM1o). <br /> All examples of projects for which PM10 precursors have been accepted as offsets for <br /> PM10 emissions have based the offset ratio on the relative effect that the precursor <br /> emissions have on ambient PM10 levels versus directly-emitted PM1o. The health <br /> benefits due to reductions of ambient concentrations of NOx,SO2,or ozone have not <br /> been considered. <br /> The determination of an appropriate interpollutant offset ratio begins by determining <br /> the air quality impact (i.e., ground level concentration) due to directly emitted PM10 <br /> from sources similar to the new source in units of microgram/cubic meter per ton per <br /> year (tpy) emitted. The general methodology is to identify the portion of measured <br /> average PM10 levels that is attributed to direct PM10 emissions from combustion sources, <br /> and divide that concentration by the portion of the emission inventory that contributes <br /> to it. The result is the theoretical amount that the regional average PM10 concentrations <br /> would go up for every new ton of PM10 directly emitted by the source category. <br /> Next,the same calculation is performed for the portion of ambient PM10 that is the result <br /> of secondary particulate formation from emissions of the pollutant providing the offsets. <br /> If the proposal is to provide SO2 reductions to offset PM10 increases,the sulfate portion <br /> of the ambient PM10 levels is divided by the SO2 inventory contributing to formation of <br /> those sulfates. <br /> S02 for PMlo <br /> The SO2 to PM10 interpollutant offset ratio is the amount of SO2 that would result in <br /> 1 pg/m3 of ground-level PM10 divided by the amount of directly emitted PM10 that <br /> would result in 1 pg/m3 of ground-level PM1o• <br /> Ambient PM10 Measurements <br /> The SJVAPCD and other jurisdictions recognize that ambient concentrations vary <br /> seasonally and require offsets to be provided on a quarterly basis. Recognizing that <br /> ambient particulate levels are higher in the winter than other seasons, some districts <br /> allow emission reductions from the winter season to be used to offset increases in other <br /> seasons,but not vice versa. <br /> All of the criteria pollutants subject to offsets for this project are, or are precursors for, <br /> PM10—a pollutant for which offsets are required because,on certain days, ambient levels <br /> exceed short-term ambient standards. The agency's goal is to reduce the pollutant levels <br /> on the worst days to below the ambient standards. <br /> In determining whether interpollutant offsets provide a net air quality benefit,therefore, <br /> it is reasonable to give greatest consideration to the season of most concern, and set a <br /> single ratio based on the days when pollutant levels exceed the standards. This <br /> approach has been taken previously by the SJVAPCD in setting PM10 interpollutant <br /> offset ratios. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.