Laserfiche WebLink
5.13 VISUAL RESOURCES <br /> • Visual composition,including an assessment of the vividness, intactness, and unity of <br /> patterns in the landscape2 <br /> The final scenic quality ratings assigned to each view fit within the rating scale summarized <br /> in Table 5.13-1. Development of this scale builds on a scale developed for use with an <br /> artificial intelligence system for evaluation of landscape visual quality (Buhyoff et al., 1994), <br /> and incorporates landscape assessment concepts applied by the U.S. Forest Service and the <br /> U.S. Department of Transportation. <br /> TABLE 5.13.1 <br /> Landscape Scenic Quality Scale <br /> Rating Explanation <br /> Outstanding A rating reserved for landscapes with exceptionally high visual quality. These landscapes are <br /> Visual Quality significant nationally or regionally. They usually contain exceptional natural or cultural features that <br /> contribute to this rating. They are what we think of as"picture post card"landscapes. People are <br /> attracted to these landscapes to view them. <br /> High Visual Landscapes that have high quality scenic value. This may be due to cultural or natural features <br /> Quality contained in the landscape or to the arrangement of spaces contained in the landscape that <br /> causes the landscape to be visually interesting or a particularly comfortable place for people. <br /> These landscapes have high levels of vividness, unity, and intactness. <br /> Moderately High Landscapes that have above average scenic value but are not of high scenic value.The scenic <br /> Visual Quality value of these landscapes may be due to man-made or natural features contained within the <br /> landscape, to the arrangement of spaces, in the landscape or to the two-dimensional attributes of <br /> the landscape. Levels of vividness, unity, and intactness are moderate to high. <br /> Moderate Visual Landscapes,that are common or typical landscapes that have, average scenic value. They <br /> Quality usually lack significant cultural or natural features. Their scenic value is primarily a result of the <br /> arrangement of spaces contained in the landscape and the two-dimensional visual attributes of the <br /> landscape. Levels of vividness, unity, and intactness are average. <br /> Moderately Low Landscapes that have below average scenic value but not low scenic value.They may contain <br /> Visual Quality visually discordant man-made alterations, but these features do not dominate the landscape.They <br /> often lack spaces that people will perceive as inviting and provide little interest in terms of two- <br /> dimensional visual attributes of the landscape. <br /> Low Visual Landscapes that have below average scenic value. They may contain visually discordant man- <br /> Quality made alterations, and often provide little interest in terms of two-dimensional visual attributes of <br /> the landscape. Levels of vividness, unity, and intactness are below average. <br /> Note: Rating scale based on Buhyoff et al., 1994; U.S. DOT Federal Highway Administration, 1988, and United <br /> States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. 1995. <br /> 5.13.1.5.1 KOP 1—View from Interstate 5 Southbound <br /> Figure 5.13-2A depicts the view from KOP 1, approximately one-half mile north of the LEC <br /> site. This viewpoint was selected because I-5 is a major public roadway,with approximately <br /> 77,000 vehicles passing the project site on the freeway daily.3 Interstate 5 is also designated <br /> 2 Vividness is the memorability of the visual impression received from contrasting landscape elements as they combine to form <br /> a striking and distinctive visual pattern. Intactness is the integrity of visual order in the natural and man-built landscape,and the <br /> extent to which the landscape is free from visual encroachment.Unity is the degree to which the visual resources of the <br /> landscape join together to form a coherent,harmonious visual pattern. Unity refers to the compositional harmony of <br /> intercompatibility between landscape elements.(US DOT FHWA 1988) <br /> 3 See Section 5.12.California Department of Transportation data from 2006 reported an average daily traffic volume of <br /> 77,000 vehicles on 1-5 near the interchange with State Route 12. <br /> 5.13-16 SAG371322I082350001(LEC_5.13_VISUAL.DOC) <br />