Laserfiche WebLink
5.15 WATER RESOURCES <br /> those requirements, and taking appropriate enforcement actions. The RWQCB adopts water <br /> quality control plans, or Basin Plans,which establish water quality objectives to ensure the <br /> reasonable protection of beneficial uses and a program of implementation for achieving <br /> water quality objectives within the Basin Plans. For those waters not attaining water quality <br /> standards, the RWQCB establishes total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) and a program of <br /> implementation to meet the TMDL1. <br /> The San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan(Basin Plan) designates beneficial <br /> uses for the Delta. Beneficial uses include agricultural supply;municipal and domestic <br /> supply; groundwater recharge;industrial service supply;industrial process supply; ocean, <br /> commercial,and sport fishing; estuarine habitat;fish migration;preservation of rare and <br /> endangered species;fish spawning;wildlife habitat;contact and non-contact water <br /> recreation;and navigation(San Francisco Bay RWQCB,2007a). <br /> Water quality objectives for the Delta are contained in the Water Quality Control Plan for <br /> the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary prepared by the State Water <br /> Resources Control Board (SWRCB;SWRCB, 1995). The Delta is considered an impaired <br /> water body. In response to growing concerns related to protection of beneficial uses in the <br /> Delta, staff from the SWRCB,San Francisco Bay RWQCB, and Central Valley RWQCB <br /> formed the Bay-Delta Team to develop a coordinated and comprehensive plan to address <br /> protection of beneficial uses in the San Francisco Bay and the Delta. <br /> Table 5.15-1 lists the pollutants for which the Delta does not meet water quality objectives <br /> and proposed TMDL completion dates. <br /> TABLE 5.15-1 <br /> Clean Water Act Section 303(d)List of Water Quality Impairments in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta <br /> Pollutant/Stressor Potential Sources Proposed TMDL Completion <br /> Chlordane Nonpoint 2008 <br /> DDT Nonpoint 2008 <br /> Dieldrin Nonpoint 2008 <br /> Dioxin Compounds Atmospheric Deposition 2019 <br /> Exotic Species Ballast Water 2019 <br /> Furan Compounds Atmospheric Deposition 2019 <br /> Mercury Multiple 2006 <br /> Nickel Unknown 2019 <br /> PCBs(Polychlorinated biphenyls) Unknown Nonpoint 2006 <br /> PCBs(dioxin-like) Unknown Nonpoint 2019 <br /> Selenium Multiple 2019 <br /> Source: San Francisco Bay RWQCB, 2007b <br /> 1 Section 303(d)of the Clean Water Act requires that the states make a list of waters that are not attaining water quality <br /> standards. For waters on this list,the states are to develop total maximum daily loads or TMDLs.A TMDL must account for all <br /> sources of the pollutants that caused the water to be listed.Federal regulations require that the TMDL,at a minimum,account for <br /> contributions from point sources(federally permitted discharges)and contributions from nonpoint sources.TMDLs are established <br /> at the level necessary to implement the applicable water quality standards.In California,the SWRCB has interpreted state law <br /> (Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act,California Water Code Section 13000 et.seq.)to require that implementation be <br /> addressed when TMDLs are incorporated into Basin Plans.The Porter-Cologne Act requires each RWQCB to formulate and adopt <br /> Basin Plans for all areas within its region. It also requires that a program of implementation be developed that describes how water <br /> quality standards will be attained.TMDLs can be developed as a component of the program of implementation,thus triggering the <br /> need to describe the implementation features,or alternatively as a water quality standard.When the TMDL is established as a <br /> standard,the program of implementation must be designed to implement the TMDL(SWRCB,n.d.). <br /> 5.15-2 SAC/371322/082340005(LEC_5.15_WATER_RESOURCES.DOC) <br />